ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Technology Blogs -> Blawg IT

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Technology

: Blawg IT

Microsoft Patent Means More Worms in Your Honeypot

By Brett Trout, Esq.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Newly published Microsoft patent application (publication number 20070289018) has a rather interesting way of outlining the problem of detecting hackers attempting to misuse your system resources:

Various techniques have been developed and used to help detect the presence of such malware; unfortunately, detection of some malware has proved to be difficult. One technique attempts to set a trap, or "honeypot," to detect the unauthorized use of network resources. For example, unused IP address space, such as a subnet, on the Internet can be set up as one or more honeypots in order to detect Internet worm activity. The computer systems that are set up as the honeypots at these addresses will not be providing any real services other than to record the activities of the invader. These honeypots are designed to wait for and detect unauthorized use of the IP addresses. The theory behind creating honeypots is that a worm that is scanning IP addresses is going to stumble across the honeypot and become detected. However, the effectiveness of such honeypots and similar detection technologies depends, in large part, on the worm blindly attempting to connect to multiple IP addresses. As the creators of these worms become more sophisticated in their methods of acquiring targets, these honeypots are becoming increasingly less successful at detecting these sophisticated worms.

Kudos on the terminology. Who says patent attorneys have no sense of humor? (Easy there . . . don't make me turn off the comments)

Microsoft's new system inserts a trap door to a detection system into a resource location store. Monitoring use of the trap door for misuse is under control of the detection system. Upon detecting misuse of the trap door entry, the system responds. The patent application suggests responses such as terminating the software application being hijacked or requesting re-authentication.

Unfortunately, the patent application makes no mention of waterboarding as an appropriate response to hackers caught in the honeypot. Hopefully however, Congress will see its way to allow waterboarding, worm removal or other response suitable for hackers slipping their worms where they should not be.

Brett Trout

Full post as published by Blawg IT on December 17, 2007 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0151 secs (new cache)