Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> IPBiz
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: IPBizMicrosoft's '666 patent
By Lawrence B. Ebert, Esq.
In a computing environment, a method comprising:
displaying at least one page of a document that has multiple pages, at least one of the multiple pages, and the displayed at least one page including a first page displayed beginning at a starting point offset from a top of the document and from a top of the first page;
calculating a height of at least the first page;
calculating a row offset of the starting point of the first page;
calculating a vertical offset at the starting point of the first page, wherein the vertical offset is calculated according to a formula of the form {[(p-1)/c]h}+r, where p is equal to the number of pages in the document, c is equal to the number of columns of the document which are simultaneously displayed, h is equal to the height of at least the first page, and r is equal to the row offset of the starting point of the first page;
receiving a command indicative of a whole page-based incremental scroll request related to changing first content currently being displayed in the at least one page;
determining a whole-page increment for scrolling from first content to second content, wherein determining the whole-page increment includes calculating a vertical offset at a second starting point in the document, the vertical offset being calculated according to the formula V.sub.1.+-.(cr), where V.sub.1 is the vertical offset at the starting point of the first page; and
changing the display to display second content, by replacing the at least one page of the document with at least one other page, the display of the at least one other page beginning at the second starting point.
Full post as published by IPBiz on September 01, 2008 (boomark / email).
Prove It
In its battle to pry open Microsoft's wallet, Alcatel-Lucent has two parallel patent cases. Yesterday it filed an identical motion in both cases, seeking full production of all Microsoft's patent license agreements with third parties...
Microsoft's Data Base Patent Invalidated in Suit with Veritas
As predicted in my earlier post on this case, Judge Coughenhour accepted findings by the special master and invalidated Microsoft's U.S Patent No. 5,558,147. The case is not over by any means...
There Is No Arizona
Whether Arizona has a functioning patent court remains an open question. Research Corporation Technologies (RCT) sued Microsoft for infringing its halftoning six-pack patent portfolio...
Are Apple ads hurting Microsoft's brand
CNET's Beyond Binary blog considers whether Apple's "I'm a Mac" ads have hurt Microsoft's brand: A new ranking of global brands shows Microsoft's reputation sinking in recent years...
Patent on Feelings
The Wall Street Journal's Health blog reports on one of Microsoft's latest patent attempts. The story states, Say you?re sitting at your computer, typing away, and suddenly you see something ? an ominous email from the boss, maybe ? that...
Microsoft's Patent Tax
Microsoft appears to have mastered the art of the patent squeeze. A recent convert from being something other than a patent piñata, since 2003, the inception of its patent licensing program, Microsoft has wrestled innumerable cross-licensing agreements from a wide variety of technology companies...
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Microsoft
Settles with Arizona for $4.4 Million
Mississippi Antitrust
Costs Microsoft $100 Million
Microsoft Corp.
allegedly failed to provide adequate access and service to Xbox Live and its subscribers.










