ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Conglomerate

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Academic

: Conglomerate

Microsoft Preparing to Go Hostile

By Gordon Smith, Christine, Hurt, Vic Fleischer, Fred Tung, Lisa Fairfax, David Zaring

ADVERTISEMENTS

Here's the letter from Steve Ballmer to Yahoo's board of directors:

We believe now is the time for our respective companies to authorize teams to sit down and negotiate a definitive agreement on a combination of our companies that will deliver superior value to our respective shareholders, creating a more efficient and competitive company that will provide greater value and service to our customers. If we have not concluded an agreement within the next three weeks, we will be compelled to take our case directly to your shareholders, including the initiation of a proxy contest to elect an alternative slate of directors for the Yahoo! board. The substantial premium reflected in our initial proposal anticipated a friendly transaction with you. If we are forced to take an offer directly to your shareholders, that action will have an undesirable impact on the value of your company from our perspective which will be reflected in the terms of our proposal.

We have all been wondering about the radio silence surrounding Yahoo's headquarters, and though we now know that Microsoft and Yahoo have been meeting, it appears that Yahoo lacks the appropriate sense of urgency.

But would Microsoft really lower its offer if required to go hostile? That might be hard to imagine, given the substantial resistance among some of Yahoo's shareholders to the original offer, but as I noted early on, many of Yahoo's current shareholders have purchased those shares lately in search of a premium. And they are unlikely to be too picky about the size of the premium at this point, because even a modest premium is better than Microsoft walking away. As Yahoo learned last week.

UPDATE: FT on the prospect of a lower bid:

A person close to Microsoft refused to confirm this meant the company would cut the value of its original offer but called Mr Ballmer?s letter ?self-explanatory.?

The value of Microsoft?s cash-and-stock bid has already slipped from its original $31 a share as the software company?s own stock has fallen, taking it to $29.36 a share at Friday?s close. Speculation has been rife on Wall Street and in Silicon Valley that Microsoft would eventually sweeten its bid for Yahoo, at least taking it back to the original $31 and potentially lifting it higher in return for a negotiated deal.

In hostile takeover fights in the US, threats to cut the value of a bid are not unusual and are sometimes followed by eventual increases. Larry Ellison, chief executive officer of Oracle, has used the tactic in his own hostile deals, threatening to reduce his offer for BEA Systems last year and actually reducing his bid for PeopleSoft before eventually paying a higher premium for both companies.

Full post as published by Conglomerate on April 06, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0034 secs (from cache 10/31/26 05:25:09)