Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Religion & Law Blogs -> Constitutionally Correct
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Religion & Law
: Constitutionally CorrectCasey Mattox: The story behind Widmar v Vincent ? Part III
By Alliance Alert
ADVERTISEMENTS
ADF Attorney Casey Mattox writing at Speak Up Movement / University: "On December 8, 1981 ? 28 years to the day before the Supreme Court granted certiorari in CLS v. Martinez ? the Supreme Court issued an 8-1 decision, authored by Justice Powell, affirming the decision of the Eighth Circuit. Writing that 'our cases leave no doubt that the First Amendment rights of speech and association extend to the campuses of state universities,' the Court held that 'UMKC has discriminated against student groups and speakers based on their desire to use a generally open forum to engage in religious worship and discussion. These are forms of speech and association protected by the First Amendment.' The Court also rejected the argument that an open forum, where student groups could discuss any topic, would have the primary effect of advancing religion in violation of the Establishment Clause." | Part I | Part IIFull post as published by Constitutionally Correct on June 14, 2010 (boomark / email).
Lawsuits and Settlements
Apeks Scuba Diving Regulator
Recalled Due To Missing Part
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.
Tyson Foods
Donates Chickens as Part of Class Action Settlement
Asbestos Cleanup
Penn. Electric Co. pays part of $77,498 settlement in environmental lawsuit.
Energy Price Gouging
Inergy Propane announces refunds to customers as part of lawsuit settlement.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Bicyclist Hit, Killed By Two Autos
The Latest AP Obituary of Jim Mattox
Mattox Funeral Arrangements Set









