ADVERTISEMENT
Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Public Defense Blogs -> Kansas Defenders
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Public Defense
: Kansas DefendersI'm ineffective!
By Randall Hodgkinson
ADVERTISEMENTS
Alice White from the Kansas Defender Project won a 1507 motion in Mattox v. State, 07 C 816 (April 23, 2008) on grounds of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. I represented Mr. Mattox on his direct appeal, which included a couple of statement suppression issues. After winning at the COA, the KSC took review and reversed the COA in State v. Mattox, No. 89,547 (Kan. Dec. 9, 2005). Mr. Mattox, with the help of the Defender Project filed a 1507 motion claiming that I was ineffective because the KSC said that I abandoned one of the suppression issues that I had raised in the COA by insufficiently raising it in the pleadings to the KSC. Judge Parrish agreed and granted the petition.Since I was a witness and former counsel, I will not comment one way or the other and simply leave it to the reader to review the decisions.
Full post as published by Kansas Defenders on April 30, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Gordon: Counsel not ineffective in failure to insist on allocution
Lawyer Raising Ineffective Assistance Claim Is the Subject of One Herself
Ineffective Assistance may not be Legal Malpractice







