Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Groklaw
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: GroklawMicrosoft Patents Sudo?!! - Updated 3Xs
By Pamela Jones et al.
Here it is, patent number7617530. Thanks, USPTO, for giving Microsoft, which is already a monopoly, a monopoly on something that's been in use since 1980 and wasn't invented by Microsoft. Here's Wikipedia's description of sudo, which you can meaningfully compare to Microsoft's description of its "invention".
This is why what the US Supreme Court does about software patents means so much. Hopefully they will address the topic in their decision on Bilski. Sudo is an integral part of the functioning of GNU/Linux systems, and you use it in Mac OSX also. Maybe the Supreme Court doesn't know that, and maybe the USPTO didn't realize it. But do you believe Microsoft knows it?
Perhaps Microsoft would like everyone in the world to pay them a toll at least, even if they don't want to use Microsoft's software? Like SCO, but with more muscle behind the request? Or maybe it might be used as a barrier to competition? What do you personally believe Microsoft wants patents on things like sudo for? To make sure innovative new companies can compete on an even playing field with Microsoft?
Full post as published by Groklaw on November 11, 2009 (boomark / email).
Microsoft
Settles with Arizona for $4.4 Million
Mississippi Antitrust
Costs Microsoft $100 Million
Microsoft Corp.
allegedly failed to provide adequate access and service to Xbox Live and its subscribers.
Windows Software
Microsoft fined $1.3 billion for failing to comply with the European Union's antitrust order.
Microsoft Spam
Richter pays $7 million settlement in deceptive email lawsuit.
Internet Gambling
Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo pay $31.5 million settlement for advertising and promoting illegal gambling sites online.

Microsoft Denied Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction a Second Time
Microsoft skates in third Lucent case
PALTALK HOLDINGS VS. MICROSOFT








