Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Federal Judiciary Blogs -> Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Federal Judiciary
: Eastern District of Texas Federal Court PracticeMotion for Summary Judgment on Patent Exhaustion & Implied License Granted in part
By Michael C. Smith
Judge: T. John Ward
Holding: Motion for Summary Judgment on Patent Exhaustion & Implied License GRANTED in part
Apparently somebody needed this opinion from last June published. In it, Judge Ward granted in part the defendants' motion for summary judgment on patent exhaustion and implied license issues. Judge Ward noted that a detailed order would follow, but in the meantime, there were three things the parties needed to know to continue preparation for trial:
- First, the exhaustion doctrine does not apply to sales made overseas by the plaintiff's licensees. As such, the court denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment to the extent it relies on the exhaustion doctrine.
- Second, QCI has an implied license with respect to drives manufactured by non-Quanta entities licensed by the plaintiff under worldwide licenses and sold by those licensees to QCI for incorporation into QCI computers. In addition, QSI is not liable for manufacturing drives for Philips or Sony/NEC/Optiarc which are, in turn, resold into the United States to non-Quanta entities. (I know we were all wondering about this).
- Finally, the Quanta defendants do not have an implied license with respect to drives that are sold through two of the plaintiff's licensees. The effect of such transactions, the Court concluded, would be to grant an impermissible sublicense.
Full post as published by Eastern District of Texas Federal Court Practice on November 23, 2009 (boomark / email).
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Compound License
Palatin Technologies pays Competitive Technologies $800,000 agreement dispute settlement.
Apeks Scuba Diving Regulator
Recalled Due To Missing Part
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.

Simulab Survives Summary Judgment (Barely) In Surgical Trainer Patent Case
Summary Judgment Granted For Microsoft on Patent Claims brought by Veritas
Indiana cases: Court: business license fee not a tax
Venali Wins Summary Judgment Motion Against Catch Curve Over Alleged AudioFax Patent Infringement
Quanta v. LG: Will the Supreme Court Clarify the Exhaustion Doctrine









