Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> LawPundit
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: LawPunditLinex Legal : Forget it : This Allegedly Free Service Is Not Free For Everyone : Possibly Illegal Discrimination on the Basis of the Email Provider
By Andis Kaulins
Recently, I ran across an outfit called Linex Legal at LinexLegal.com (apparently based in the UK) which allegedly offers a free legal newsletter service. They write at their website:
"Sign up for a free account
Discover what you have been missing. Sign up now for your free account and access all the latest updates and reviews covering your area of interest."
When I went to the registration page at the Linex Legal registration page, they - however - had the following proviso:
"If you register with a public email address (hotmail, yahoo, gmail etc), your access to Linex may be restricted."
Hmm. Can one - as a matter of law - offer a free online service in come-on advertising, without CLEARLY and EXPRESSLY limiting that come-on accordingly, and then discriminate against certain preselected public email providers at the registration page? I doubt it.
OK. I did want to see what this service was all about - more out of curiosity than out of any expected utility - so I registered for the allegedly free service with my personal Stanford Alumni address, and got the following reply:
"Unfortunately ? being a business to business tool ? we can only accept registrations with an academic email address."
I suppose from that statement that they only offer their free service to those who are actively getting paid by academic institutions and from whom some kind of a business-to-business commercial or advertising advantage at such institutions appears obtainable in the short or long term.
In other words, the "free" advertising aspect is just a come-on for commercial ends.
Now, in our view, either such law sites are offering a free or a commercial service - nothing wrong with that, as long as the service is truthfully labelled - but the "free" misleading come-on in the Linex Legal advertising is not suitable for the legal field and in our opinion, unless clearly, expressly, and openly advertised as being free for only a select group of persons, i.e. for those with active academic email addresses, it would appear to us that the Linex Legal advertising is clearly misleading and thus fraudulent as a matter of law.
The harm to persons such as myself is that I wasted a good bit of my valuable time registering for a free service which actually was not intended to be free for me - and I am quite angry about that. Time is my most valuable commodity and I do not have a mind to award it for free to outfits like Linex Legal. I have a mind to bill Linex Legal for my lost time -and that bill would be quite expensive - and rightly so.
Full post as published by LawPundit on May 22, 2009 (boomark / email).
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Pre-paid Leagal Services
What are Prepaid Legal Benefit Plans
Illegal Immigrant Responsibility and Reform Act of 1996
Explanation of the controversial illegal immigration law
DC Madame Phone List
Telephone Records of Deborah Jeane Palfrey's Escort Service (Pamela Martin and Associates)
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Free Water Sewer Services
US Cold Storage to pay $125,910 in sewer service settlement.
Wendy's International Inc.
allegedly fired illegal immigrant employees after missing a deadline to obtain legal status.
Oppenheimer ATM-Free New York Municipals
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.

Accommodating Religion at Work: A Principled Approach to Title VII and Religious Freedom
UNSW thinking about stopping free wi-fi ... what is this really about
VersusLaw's New Almost Completely Free Legal Research Service
Wal-Mart Accused of Workplace Discrimination
Subscribe to FindLaw's Free Email Newsletters
The Free CLE Just Keeps on Coming









