Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Technology Blogs -> Blawg IT
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Law Technology
: Blawg ITMicrosoft Employee Spying Patent
By Brett Trout, Esq.

Well, it is not really a spy patent, and I know no one would ever conceive of using Microsoft's new invention for such a thing. I am just saying some boss, somewhere, might be inclined to use this obviously pro-employee system of monitoring their bodily functions for evil, rather than for good. According to the patent application:
When a parameter is violated or a threshold is satisfied or exceeded, the system can automatically initiate the help request in order to identify the target activity and target user and determine the type or source of assistance most suitable for Joe and his activity. Parameters or thresholds can relate to the particular activity, to the user's physical state, or to the user's environment. For example, sensors can monitor the user's heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature, galvanic skin response, EMG, brain signals, respiration rate, movement, facial movements, facial expressions, etc. Alternatively, Joe can expressly request assistance.
See. It says right in the patent application "help request." It does not say that the email Joe receives because his blood pressure is too high asks him to clear out his desk. It does not even suggest such a consequence. Just because it can be used to automatically fire employees based upon their bodily functions, is no reason to think that it will be used to fire them.
All of those civil liberties groups and privacy lawyers up in arms about the threat this patent application poses are probably overacting. In the remote case that they are correct, however, and, to your chagrin, this patent pending system comes to company near you, I might suggest you simply grin and bear it. Otherwise, its facial recognition feature just might determine you are not a team player.
Oh, and you might want to cut back on the bran.
Full post as published by Blawg IT on January 16, 2008 (boomark / email).
Employee Lawsuits (An Introduction and Topic Overview)
How employers can cope with the siege of employee lawsuits
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
Adzilla
Faces Class Action for Internet Spying
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Microsoft
Settles with Arizona for $4.4 Million
Mississippi Antitrust
Costs Microsoft $100 Million

Challenging Patent Validity: Microsoft Asks Supreme Court to Reduce "Clear and Convincing" Standard
Microsoft skates in third Lucent case







