
Employee Lawsuits: Introduction, Table of Contents
How employers can cope with the siege of employee lawsuits
A jury in Seattle, Wash., concludes that an employer did not discriminate against a female sales manager but nevertheless awards her $11.7 million on her claim that the company retaliated against her for bringing gender discrimination issues to the attention of management. A Pennsylvania woman is awarded $1.4 million by a jury that determines that her employer defamed her by telling her co-employees that she stole a bag of potato chips. Employees working for a Connecticut telecommunications company are awarded $14.5 million because they were required to stay at the job site while they ate lunch.
Two female office workers in Florida receive an award of $6 million on their sexual harassment claim against a plastic surgeon. A female lab technician is awarded $4.2 million in Pennsylvania after she was successful in proving that a hostile environment existed for her in her place of employment. In California, a male employee claiming sexual harassment by his female supervisor (who allegedly forced him to have intercourse with her) is awarded over $1 million by a jury.
Texaco Corporation settles a race discrimination lawsuit brought by six black employees for $176 million. Martin Marietta Corporation agrees to pay $13 million in back pay and rehire 450 older workers at an estimated cost of $171 million in order to settle an age discrimination class action lawsuit. Southern California Edison Company enters into an $11.25 million settlement with nine black plaintiffs who brought a class action alleging that the utility company had limited pay increases, career advancement, and other employment opportunities for black employees.
In today's litigious society, employers have become a key target. The Commission on the Future of Worker-Management Relations, an advisory body appointed by President Clinton, analyzed data regarding lawsuits filed in federal court during a 20-year period from 1971 to 1991. The total number of personal injury cases filed in federal court during that 20-year period increased by 17 percent. The total number of employment law disputes filed in federal court, however, increased 430 percent in that same 20 year period, a larger increase than any other classification of cases. Employment claims are rapidly becoming the "slip and fall" action for the 21st century.
These statistics, while frightening in their own right, may understate the threat faced by employers. The Commission's study ended before passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Family and Medical Leave Act, all of which have generated even more litigation. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 is particularly responsible for luring many new plaintiff's attorneys into the employment litigation field. This statute allows plaintiffs to receive large compensatory and punitive damage awards for violations of employment discrimination statutes. The discharged employee has become a more appealing prospective client for many lawyers who had heretofore disdained representation of discharged employees because they could only recover back wages and "make whole" relief such as medical expenses.
The Civil Rights Act of 1991 also created a jury trial right for employees claiming discrimination, a procedural change that has increased the size of damage awards. The median jury verdict in employment cases in 1995 was $184,000, up more than 40 percent from the median verdict in 1994. Juries in employment law cases are notoriously sympathetic to plaintiffs and unsympathetic to corporate defendants. Many jurors have spent their entire working lives as nonsupervisory employees; very few have held positions where they were required to make hiring or firing decisions.
In addition to discrimination actions, employers are also being sued on various "wrongful discharge" theories. The once venerable employment-at-will rule, which held that employment may be terminated by either the employer or the employee at any time, for good reason, bad reason, or no reason at all, is riddled with exceptions such as the "public policy" exception or the "covenant of good faith and fair dealing" exception. Employees who cannot dredge up a public policy violation will, nevertheless, claim that their employers breached an employment contract by discharging them. Finally, in virtually every wrongful discharge or employment discrimination action, the employee bringing the lawsuit will also state several "tort" claims such as intentional infliction of emotional distress, assault, battery, defamation, and invasion of privacy. These tort claims also allow for the recovery of punitive damages, thus increasing the potential for large damage awards against employers.
How can a business protect itself from potential jury verdicts in favor of disgruntled employees? My primary goal in writing this book is to show employers how to avoid unnecessary labor and employment law problems and stay out of court. You may be asking yourself: What in the world does a lawyer know about keeping employers out of court? The answer is that I have spent the last 15 years doing exactly that - helping clients avoid costly employment litigation.
10 Protective Principles
This book is based on 10 protective principles that I have distilled from the advice that I have given employers over the last 15 years. The principles are not magical talismans for making employment litigation disappear. Rather, each principle is intended as a reminder to employers of certain strategies that can keep them out of court.
Employment-at-will is a myth.
Employers can no longer afford to discharge employees for "good reason, bad reason, or no reason at all." Even if it's only unemployment compensation liability, a discharge decision that is not grounded in a valid performance-based reason will cost the employer money.
Disclaim everything in your handbook
Employers will be held accountable for promises they make to employees. If a statement is not intended as a promise, the employer's intention in this regard should be made clear to employees.
Never fire a pregnant woman.
Some employees - no, make that many employees - hold protected status under state and federal discrimination laws. Therefore, the employer should not discharge these employees without a well-documented nondiscriminatory reason.
There is no such thing as a "safe" workplace romance.
Sexual harassment is the most dangerous of all employment discri mination claims. Employers cannot allow sexual harassment to exist in their workplace no matter how benign its origin.
Give abusive or combative employees the maximum penalty.
The incidence of abusive, aggressive, or violent behavior in the workplace is increasing. Employers should take a very hard line against workplace violence.
Assume that every workplace injury will be an ADA disability.
Employers must remember that any chronic physical ailment, any bizarre mental disorder, or even an asymptomatic condition may be protected by the broad definition of disability in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Never assume an employee is exempt
Employers are cautioned against being overinclusive when categorizing employees as exempt for wage and hour purposes. The "salary basis" requirement for establishing an exemption from the overtime requirements in wage and hour statutes is undoubtedly the most violated provision in the federal wage and hour regulations.
If they don't need to know, don't tell.
Employers should abide by the rule of confidentiality when handling personnel matters. Employees have received huge damage awards on claims that an untrue communication by their employer damaged their reputation.
Employee privacy is not an inalienable right.
Employee privacy need not be a primary concern for employers as they operate their business. There are laws that regulate workplace privacy issues but, in general, employers who do not create an expectation of privacy for employees by allowing them to believe that they or their possessions will be free from surveillance or searches have no reason to fear invasion of privacy claims.
It's never too late for union avoidance.
Employers who practice positive employee relations, which is really the basis for the first nine principles, will not be targeted by unions for organizing. However, even if an employer is confronted with the prospect of a union organizing campaign, it is never too late to defeat the union.
Goals and Objectives
In writing this book, I have tried to give practical advice for avoiding problems that can lead to litigation. Each chapter starts with an introductory narrative which, although completely fictional, has its roots in actual problems that can confront employers. As you read each narrative, try and figure out what the employer is doing right or where there has been a misstep. Sometimes the result is obvious, but there also may be a surprise along the way.
I have built the legal discussion in each chapter around actual cases. Employers can take a lot of information from the case discussions in each chapter, which they can apply to their own business. I have closed each chapter with a summation section that outlines the things employers should be doing to minimize their potential for liability.
his book is intended as a practical guide for employers, human resource professionals, managers, and supervisors who want to avoid workplace problems. It is not intended to give legal advice on any specific problem where particular facts underlying the problem may recommend analysis by a competent labor and employment law attorney. This book will help managers respond effectively to day-to-day issues that arise in the workplace. The author is not soliciting an attorney-client relationship with any particular reader.
Contents
I. Employment-at-Will Is a Myth
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Theory
Public Policy Exceptions to Employment-at-Will Rule
The Termination Decision
Defenses to Public Policy Wrongful Discharge Claims
II. Disclaim Everything in Your Handbook
Avoiding Enforceable Promises
Theory of Contract Formation
Offer Letters and Implied Contracts of Employment
Individual Employment Contracts
Misrepresentation or Fraud
Promissory Estoppel and the Covenant of Good Faith
Minimizing Exposure
III. Never Fire a Pregnant Woman
Ever-Expanding Discrimination Protections
Sex Discrimination
Race Discrimination
National Origin and Religious Discrimination
Harassment - Not Just a Sexual Thing
National Origin and Religious Discrimination
Reducing Potential Discrimination Claims
IV. Sexual Harassment
No 'Safe' Workplace Romances
Liability for Sexual Harassment
Pervasiveness of Sexual Harassment
Defenses Against Harassment Charges
Same Gender Harassment and Tort Causes
Discharging Harassers
Avoiding Harassment Claims
V. Abusive or Combative Employees
Violence in the Workplace
Identifying the Violent Employee
Negligent Hiring and Retention
Intentional Torts and Mental Disabilities
Background Checks
How to Deal With Violent Employees
VI. Dealing With the ADA
ADA Disabilities and Workplace Injuries
ADA - Two-Stage Hiring Process
ADA - Reasonable Accommodation and Undue Hardship
The Safety Defense
ADA - Alcoholism, Drugs, Mental Disorders Obesity, and AIDS
ADA Preparation Steps
VII. Coping With the Fair Labor Standards Act
DOL Investigations
Wage Liability
Exempt Employees
Overtime and Other Forms of Compensation
Avoiding Wage/Hour Liabililty
VIII. Defamatory Liability
Defamatory Behavior
Defamatory Performance Evaluations
Defamatory References
Fighting and Avoiding Defamation Liability
IX. Employee Privacy Rights
Limited Right of Employee Privacy
Invasions of Privacy
Privacy in the Computer Age
Avoiding Invasion of Privacy Claims
X. Union Avoidance
Decline of Unions
Reinvorated Union Organizing
Discouraging Union Organizers
Union Avoidance 'Do's' and 'Don'ts'
How to Stay Union-Free
Appendix
Company Policies
Excerpted from Slam the Door on Employee Lawsuits: Keep Your Business Out of Court. Copyright 1998 by Paul M. Lusky. Published by arrangement with Career Press.
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
Summary Judgement for Dismissal of Personal Injury Lawsuits Require Establishment that Defendant didn't Create the Dangerous Condition of have actual or Constructive Notice of its Existence.
After picking up lunch from the deli counter of a local ...
Should I Sue? Examining the Complex Question and the Role Apologies Play in Medical Malpractice Lawsuits
WBUR examines the medical apologies issue: On WBUR, a Boston NPR s...
Bill Proposes to Allow Sex Abuse Victims to File Injury Lawsuits in Maryland
In Maryland, Baltimore County legislator Eric M. Bromwell has intr...
Customers voluntarily dismiss Taco JohnÂ’s from E. coli lawsuits ...
Taco John's has been dismissed from a set of vicarious liability ...
U.S. Supreme Court Deals Blow to Lawsuits Against Defective Products
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that private lawsuits agai...
Here is a report on recent jury verdicts in employment lawsuits
VERDICTS IN FAVOR OF EMPLOYEES A jury in Ohio awarded a whopping $47 million to an employee in an age discrimination case...
Cashed Out Participant is Still a Participant for Breach of Fiduciary Lawsuits
When is comes to litigating over alleged fiduciary breaches, when is a terminated employee no longer a participant...
Employer Ordered To Produce Employee Contact Information in Overtime Lawsuit
In employment lawsuits, plaintiffs? attorneys frequently request information about employees other than the plaintiff, including address and telephone numbers for current and former employees...
Frivolous Lawsuits
Frivolous lawsuits? Ever hear someone complain that there is too much money being spent on frivolous lawsuits? Are frivolous lawsuits driving up the cost of insurance? What about health care? The answer is a resounding “no...
How Much Do Lawsuits Cost?
People in the US love to rail about the fact that there are too many lawsuits, too many greedy plaintiffs gaming the system, too many people refusing to take responsibility for their own errors...
Supreme Court Hears Important ERISA Case
The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday heard oral argument in the MetLife v. Glenn case...
I have worked for this employer for only three weeks. The employer makes up his own rules as to what he chooses to report for the purpose of property taxes. He tells me to "let them come after us". He defines Entertain
He arrogantly insists, "let them come after us." Well, if you are invo...
Can a tow company charge as much as they want to tow your car if it is parked illegally?
The towing companies contract with condo associations and the like to tow cars i...
What would you be willing to pay for Breakfast Bites?
Depends how long the morning lasts, but I would say between 75 - 150 pounds....
Can my employer threaten me with termination if I don't seek a transfer to another department?
In many jurisdictions, employees are "at will". This means that their employmen...
How to prevent an arrest from appearing in the local newspaper?
Dont know the law in Minnesota but in most jurisdictions an arrest is a matter o...
Lawyers! Want your Website or Blog Included Here?
Contact us!
You'll get lots of targetted new traffic and client leads. We'll also improve your existing online presence or even build you a new website or blog!

I have worked for this employer for only three weeks. The employer makes up his own rules as to what he chooses to report for the purpose of property taxes. He tells me to "let them come after us". He defines Entertain
He arrogantly insists, "let them come after us." Well, if you are invo...
Can a tow company charge as much as they want to tow your car if it is parked illegally?
The towing companies contract with condo associations and the like to tow cars i...
What would you be willing to pay for Breakfast Bites?
Depends how long the morning lasts, but I would say between 75 - 150 pounds....
Can my employer threaten me with termination if I don't seek a transfer to another department?
In many jurisdictions, employees are "at will". This means that their employmen...
How to prevent an arrest from appearing in the local newspaper?
Dont know the law in Minnesota but in most jurisdictions an arrest is a matter o...

















