ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> The FRAUDfiles Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Litigation

: The FRAUDfiles Blog

Gradient scores huge victory in court against Overstock.com

By Tracy Coenen

ADVERTISEMENTS

COURT RULES THAT GRADIENT ANALYTICS’ CROSS-COMPLAINT MAY PROCEED AGAINST OVERSTOCK.COM, INC. ON ALL COUNTS
AMENDED CLAIMS TO BE FILED AGAINST OVERSTOCK CEO PATRICK BYRNE

Scottsdale, July 10, 2008

Gradient Analytics, Inc. announced today that the Marin County Superior Court has ruled in the case of Overstock.com, Inc., v. Gradient that all of Gradient’s cross-claims against Overstock (NASDAQ:OSTK), including claims for defamation, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and unfair business practices, may proceed, thereby rejecting Overstock’s challenge to certain of those claims. Gradient has alleged that Overstock and its CEO Patrick Byrne, have waged a malicious smear campaign against it in retaliation for Gradient’s published opinions concerning the quality of Overstock’s earnings and other aspects of its business. Gradient is seeking compensatory and punitive damages against Overstock, as well as injunctive relief under its California Unfair Business Practices claim.

The court also ruled, in response to  Mr. Byrne’s statute of limitations challenges, that Gradient may amend its pleading to add recent instances of Byrne’s ongoing false and defamatory statements about the company and other wrongful conduct on his part. The court also rejected Byrne’s attempt to dismiss Gradient’s claim for tortious interference against Byrne. Gradient will be filing its amended cross-complaint in the next 20 days and fully expects to present its claims against Byrne and Overstock to a Marin County jury.

“We are very pleased with the court’s ruling,” stated Gradient’s CEO, Brad Forst, “and eagerly await the opportunity at trial to present all the evidence of Overstock’s and Byrne’s wrongdoing to a jury.”   Mr. Forst also noted that “back in April, Overstock’s chief legal officer tried to characterize Gradient’s cross-complaint as a ’smoke screen,’ and vowed that Overstock ‘will simply turn on the fans and blow that smoke right back at them.’  Well it now seems those fans are headed straight back to Overstock’s Merchandise Returns Department.”


Copyright © 2008 Sequence Inc. All rights reserved.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright. (Digital Fingerprint:
d8e155abd66dfea6417f56f6831614fa)

Full post as published by The FRAUDfiles Blog on July 10, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0027 secs (from cache 10/31/26 16:23:06)