ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Education Law Blogs -> Special Education Law Blog

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Education Law

: Special Education Law Blog

Unusual Gains in NCLB Test Scores

By Charles Fox

ADVERTISEMENTS

In Maryland there has been an unusual spike in test scores among public school students. Some of the increases are so high that questions are being raised as to whether the scores are valid. In particular an expert in  education policy stated:

" I think most people are trying to do the right thing," said Jack Jennings, president of the Center on Education Policy. "But the pressure to get results is enormous, and some people fail. Some people sin."

Apparently, Denver has also experienced remarkable reversals in test scores in its schools.

I have to agree with Mr. Jenning's comments that "some people sin."  I recently tried and won a case in due process against a school that takes enormous pride in its test scores on high stakes testing. The school has one class per grade so each individual student's score can change that grade's score either up or down. Losing ground on test scores for this school could have obvious consequences from a NCLB point of view, but in this instance it was also about pride, bragging rights and even resources from the Board of Education.

The student who I represented had significant reading disabilities and on several rounds of testing was reading far below grade level. However, on his NCLB testing he scored at the same or similar level as his grade peers in reading. This apparent contradiction bothered me up to and during the hearing, until I had the teacher on the stand who administered the NCLB testing. She admitted that she had him read the passages out loud and thought nothing of it. On cross examination, she admitted that this practice would allow her to voluntarily and even involuntarily indicate to the student to correct and re-read. She further admitted that she did not use this practice with any other student except for one other, who also had a significant reading disability. The hearing officer noted that this practice was questionable and bore negative inferences (e.g. borderline cheating).

In conversations with school psychologists, I have been informed that students have been tested on reading with familiar word-wall words at hand an other teaching aides in sight that are "just part of the classroom." So much for strict proctoring of tests. I can assure you that no law school would have passages from Black's Law Dictionary on the wall during the bar exam.  This story out of Maryland, Denver and my experiences raises a significant element of doubt about the validity of testing to measure student progress,  if schools are prepared to cheat or shade things in their favor. I do not know that cheating or other impropriety has happened in Maryland or Denver but it certainly raises doubts and the desire to inquire further.

Full post as published by Special Education Law Blog on July 31, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0128 secs (new cache)