Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> Washington Labor, Employment & Employee Benefits Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Labor & Employment Law
: Washington Labor, Employment & Employee Benefits LawFMLA Protection for Part-timers?
By Donald W. Heyrich
This week the Indiana Supreme Court held that an employee f illing multiple positions with the same employer is eligible for leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act if that employee?s total service is sufficient to qualify - even if service in either position alone does not qualify.
Tom Powell taught math at Lew Wallace High School in Gary, Indiana, since 1987. From 1987 to 1999, Powell served as an assistant football coach, and in 2000, he was promoted to head football coach. Beginning in 1995, Powell also served as assistant basketball coach at Lew Wallace. For the 2001?2002 school year, Powell was under contract as a math teacher, night school teacher, and head football coach.
After injuring his leg twice and taking seven weeks leave as a result, the board of Gary Community School Corporation (GCSC) fired him from his head football coaching position and replaced him with the assistant coach. After unsuccessfully reapplying for the head coach position twice in 2002 and 2003, Powell brought an action alleging that GCSC violated the Family and Medical Leave Act by failing to restore him as coach for the 2001 season and by retaliating against him for taking FMLA leave by rejecting him as head football coach in subsequent years. Powell and GCSC both moved for summary judgment on several issues, including whether Powell?s leave was covered by the FMLA. The trial court granted summary judgment for Powell on this issue and concluded that GCSC had violated the FMLA by failing to reinstate Powell as head football coach in 2001. Damages for failure to reinstate remained for trial along with Powell?s separate claim that GCSC had retaliated for taking FMLA leave. The trial resulted in an award of damages totaling $280,200.20 for the failure to reinstate and the 3 retaliation claims. The trial court reduced the award to $188,919.29 and added prejudgment interest of $18,274 and attorneys fees of $125,000. The Court of Appeals reversed, concluding that Powell was not eligible for FMLA leave.
Full post as published by Washington Labor, Employment & Employee Benefits Law on May 22, 2009 (boomark / email).
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Apeks Scuba Diving Regulator
Recalled Due To Missing Part
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Germantown Primary Care Associates, P.C.
Unlawfully collected fees refunded in Consumer Protection Act violation suit.
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.
Tyson Foods
Donates Chickens as Part of Class Action Settlement
Asbestos Cleanup
Penn. Electric Co. pays part of $77,498 settlement in environmental lawsuit.

Checking In On Child Not FMLA Protected
Better Than 75% Of Part-timers At Law Firms Of All Sizes Are Female
5th Rejects Association Claim Under FMLA
Employee's alteration of FMLA application results in denial of leave







