Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> LAW IN MOLDOVA
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
International Law
: LAW IN MOLDOVACan Microsoft Be the First Case for the Newly Created Competition Authority
By Alexei Ghertescu
Friday's Logos Press Economic Review comes up with an article called "From whom to protect competition?" The article's author, Irina Covalenco, provided a review of opinions expressed during the round table organized on June 19 by the Economic Council attached to the Prime Minister jointly with the National Agency on Protection of Competition (hereinafter- the Agency).
A lot of doubts were expressed regarding the prospects of the Agency's efficient activity. And it was told that puting aside all those douts we have to wait for the first serious case of anti-monopoly investigation...
The beginning of the story
...About a half a year ago or so the big campaign against software piracy started in Moldova. There were a lot rumors about massive inspections carried out by police and AGEPI (the Agency for Intellectual Property) representatives in order to reveal facts of illegal use of software products. It was also said that this campaign was initiated by the Moldovan representative office of Microsoft Corp. (read more in Russian here and here). And though the state officials stated that the goal was to check the legality of use of all software products, the main product to be controlled was considered MS Windows operating systems.
The basic objection of business structures and individual users against this campaign was (and still is) the price of Microsoft products. It is told to be too high for Moldovan software market.
The case to intervene?..
And here it may seem to be the possibility to intervene for the newly created National Agency for Protection of Competition. There is almost no competition in the market of operating systems in Moldova. Microsoft products hold almost the total monopoly position. Certainly there are other products like Linux, for instance. However, very few ordinary users know about it and are ready to use it. Moreover, many important programs are compatible only with Windows. For example, at the beginning of the year we called to one of the Moldovan banks to know if their system "Client-Bank" (the system providing the possibility to make bank transfers through electronic network by using digital signatures; the system is widely spread among many moldovan companies) is compatible with Linux. The answer was: "No, the system was made only for Windows"...
So, we have a product that takes almost a monopolistic position in the market. And we have a lot of complaints about its price (I'm not asserting whether it is expensive or not for our market, this is the issue to be decided by competent specialists and authorities).
Now let's see what the law says.
Under art. 20, para. (2)-a) of the Law No. 1103 of June 30, 2000 "On Protection of Competition" the Government has the right to regulate prices in order to prevent cases of abuses of the dominant position in the market.
And this gives to the Agency the right to intervene in order to investigate whether there are the signs of an abuse of the dominant position by Microsft corp. or not by etablishing the current prices for its products...
So, do you think this may be the first big case for the Agency, or not?...
Full post as published by LAW IN MOLDOVA on June 27, 2007 (boomark / email).
The Microsoft Case: The IT industry and the Future of EC Competition Law
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol The University of Birmingham Institute for European law will host The Microsoft Case: The IT industry and the Future of EC Competition Law. Conference Programme 16:00 ? 16:30 Registration and coffee 16:30-16:40 Welcome and introduction...
St. Patrick's Day, Ireland and Competition Policy
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol You could not ask for better timing. Earlier this year, the Irish Competition Authority undertook some competition advocacy work involving the alcohol sector...
The European Microsoft Case at the Crossroads of Competition Policy and Innovation
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol Pierre Larouche, Tilburg University and the College of Europe provides his assessment of The European Microsoft Case at the Crossroads of Competition Policy and Innovation...
Jersey Competition Regulatory Authority Seeks an Economic Adviser
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol From the press release: The Jersey Competition Regulatory Authority (JCRA) is the competition law enforcement authority for Jersey, the largest of the Channel Islands in between Great Britain and France...
Irish Competition Authority Report Finds Competition between Grocers is Limited by the Retail Planning System
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol The Irish Competition Authority released a report this week on competition in the supermarket sector. As regular readers of this blog know, supermarkets are hot topics in the US, UK, Australia, Chile and Ireland...
Microsoft Targeted in Another EU Competition Investigation
The EU is following up on complaints by Opera and others that Microsoft is stifling competition by tying Internet Explorer to Windows and not following standards by opening a formal investigation...
Grand River Dam Authority
Faces Class Action over Flood Damage
Microsoft
Settles with Arizona for $4.4 Million
Lake Superior Center Authority
$275,000 settlement reached in construction dispute.
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
$2.3 million settlement reached in wrongful death lawsuit.
Mississippi Antitrust
Costs Microsoft $100 Million
Microsoft Corp.
allegedly failed to provide adequate access and service to Xbox Live and its subscribers.









