Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Family Law Blogs -> Florida Divorce - Child Custody - Domestic Abuse Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Family Law
: Florida Divorce - Child Custody - Domestic Abuse LawOregon Indian Tribe Member Challenges Legalization By Tribe?s Six Person Governing Body of Same Sex Marriages and Domestic Partnerships
By Janet Langjahr
Oregon’s Coquille Indian Tribe’s Tribal Council, the six person governing body for the Tribe, recently passsed an Ordinance allowing domestic partnerships and same sex marriages with a member of the Tribe.
Now, one Tribe member is challenging the approved Ordinance and petitioning to have the Ordinance put to a vote by all Tribe members, numbering approximately 600.
The Ordinance could extend Tribal financial benefits to more people.
The Ordinance would first require the passing of laws to unravel such domestic partnerships and same sex marriages by divorce and to determine child custody. That is expected to take months.
The Ordinance would also recognize domestic partnerships and same sex marriages validly entered in jurisdictions that permit them.
If 200 members of the Tribe join the petition, the Ordinance will be put to a general vote.
The activist cites as his primary concerns about the Ordinance that it imposes vital statistics record-keeping chores that the Tribe does not currently have and that the Ordinance is reportedly contrary to Oregon law as well as federal law
Read more in this Coos Bay Oregon World article: Tribe?s gay marriage law faces challenge.
Full post as published by Florida Divorce - Child Custody - Domestic Abuse Law on November 03, 2008 (boomark / email).
Oregon tribe to allow same-sex marriages
At the request of a lesbian couple, the Coquille Indian Tribe on the southern Oregon coast has adopted a law recognizing same-sex marriage.
CA1: another chapter in Narragansett Indian Tribe lawsuit ends on procedural note
Thomas v. State of RI, No. 07-1985. This is yet another appeal regarding a raid onto the tribal lands. As you may recall, the First Circuit in Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Rhode Island, 449 F...
Cachil Dehe Band v. State of California (9th Cir - Aug. 8, 2008)
It's a case about Indian gaming. You represent the Indian tribe, and want more slot machines. You've lost in the district court, and now appeal to the Ninth Circuit. You're waiting for the panel to be announced just prior to oral argument...
Snoqualmie Lawsuit Claims Member Ousted For Religious Reasons
Yesterday's SnoValley Star reports that nine members of the Snoqualmie Tribe of Indians who were banished by the tribe's new government have filed suit against the Tribe in federal district court in Washington state...
L&C Law’s Bill Funk and Robert Miller on Oregon Tribe Sanctioning Same-Sex Marriages
L&C Law’s Bill Funk and Robert Miller on Oregon Tribe Sanctioning Same-Sex Marriages
Economic development compact could spur new investment in Indian Country
The Crow Tribe in Montana has become the first Indian tribe to enter into a so-called "Economic Development Compact" with a state to make it easier for banks to file secured loans within the Tribe's Reservation...
Domestic Violence
Women's Rights
Domestic Violence
Emotional and verbal abuse qualify as domestic violence
Domestic Violence
Emotional and verbal abuse qualify as domestic violence
Domestic Violence
Steps to avoid
Rightwing Extremism
Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment
US Settles Indian Lawsuit for $3.4 Billion
US Government Settles Indian Lawsuit for $3.4 Billion
Oklahoma Bacterial Outbreak
One Person Dead, 14 Hospitalized
Understaffed Elder Care
Sunwest Management pays $5.5 million in two class action settlements with California and Oregon residents.
US Army Helicopter Crashes On Campus
1 Crew Member dies
American Cellular Laboratories
FDA Issues Warning about Body Building Products
Marketing Spam
Member Source Media pays $200,000 civil penalty for deceptive online advertising.









