Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Arbitration & Mediation Blogs -> Settle It Now Negotiation Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Arbitration & Mediation
: Settle It Now Negotiation BlogShould You Raise the Spectre of "CSI" Juror Bias at a Mediation?
By Victoria Pynchon
Listen, if corporate entities believed they couldn't overcome juror bias, they would never try a case. How to accomplish that feat is the difficult task of every great trial attorney who represents a corporate defendant.
Despite the research cited below, I do not suggest that plaintiffs' attorneys, as a matter of mediation strategy, suggest to corporate defendants that they will lose at trial because of juror bias. Why? Because it more or less enrages people, including corporate representatives, to be told that they must pay more money than they believe a case is worth because the system is unjust.
The report on juror bias -- particularly so-called CSI juror bias -- below.
The good news is that the bad news comes from one of the best jury consulting firms in town -- Jury Impact. What's so good about that? Jury Impact doesn't simply report bias, its people understand bias and are prepared to combat it. Without consultants like Jury Impact's Chris St. Hilaire, however, a corporation's best alternative to trial may well be a reasonable settlement that serves its commercial rather than its justice interests.
The Jury Impact report below:
In a question we’ve asked in several surveys, approximately 62% of prospective jurors say they would ignore the law in order to hold a corporation financially responsible, if they thought the individual was sympathetic.
While this is a general bias, among . . . “CSI jurors” [those who watch crime/medical drama TV shows] it’s consistently worse. Approximately 72% of the “CSI jurors” said they would ignore the law and hold a corporation responsible.
Why is this? A Hollywood producer recently gave us a pretty succinct and convincing explanation: “Look at the plotlines in these shows. Is the corporation ever the good guy? The jurors are using confirmation bias to build the storyline they want to believe…the one they’re familiar with.”
Full post as published by Settle It Now Negotiation Blog on January 25, 2008 (boomark / email).
Lawry's Restaurants Settles Sex Bias Lawsuit for $1 Million
Lawry's Restaurants Settles Sex Bias Lawsuit for $1Million
Wal-Mart
To Pay $17.5 Million To Settle Race Bias Suit
Employee Discrimination
Vanguard Group Inc. agrees to $500,000 racial bias settlement.
Age Discrimination
City of Independence awards two former employees a $65,000 age bias settlement.
Gender Bias
Las Vegas pays $500,000 settlement in harassment lawsuit.

Nevada Supreme Court considers issue of grand juror bias
Juror Bias Could Sink Mattel/Bratz Verdict
Great Series on Mediation Preparation for the Advocate
“Conflicting Views” Raise a Reasonable Doubt









