(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Defense Newsletter Blog 

Breaking news supplementing the Defense Newsletter covering 11th Circuit and Supreme Court Cases.
Post Frequency: 9.1/day Last Entry: October 27, 2020 at 13:19:00 Recent Entries: 355
By Tim Cone
Go to Defense Newsletter Blog, find other Criminal Law blogs, or browse all law blogs.
Johnson: Counsel not ineffective in failing to call prison expert
Posted on August 24, 2010In Johnson v. Upton, No. 09-16090 (Aug. 23, 2010), the Court affirmed the denial of habeas relief to a Georgia inmate sentenced to death for a 1994 murder.The Court rejected the claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to call a penological expert who would have testified, at the penalty phase of Johnson?s trial, that, statistically inmates who serve long prison sentences (instead of being sentenced to death) do not present a future danger because of their tendency to adjust to prison life...
Bellizia: Ineffective Counsel for Failing to argue heroin was not weighed
Posted on August 23, 2010In Bellizia v. Dep?t of Corrections, No. 09-13838 (Aug. 20, 2010), the Court affirmed the grant of habeas relief to a Florida inmate because his defense counsel was constitutionally ineffective in failing to challenge the State?s failure to weigh each of the pellets of heroin found on Bellizia...
Chirino-Alvarez: Alien Smuggler Participated Throughout
Posted on August 23, 2010In U.S. v. Chirino-Alvarez, No. 09-11317 (Aug. 23, 2010), the Court rejected sufficiency of the evidence challenges to alien-smuggling convictions.Citing the Ninth Circuit?s en banc decision in U.S. v. Lopez, the Court recognized that the evidence would be insufficient if Chirino-Alvarez? participation in the alien-smuggling scheme occurred only after the aliens arrived in the United States...
Kottwitz: Good Faith Reliance Instruction Should Have Been Given
Posted on August 20, 2010In U.S. v. Kottwitz, No 08-13740 (Aug. 19, 2010), the Court held that the evidence was insufficient to sustain some tax fraud charges, and that a new trial was required on others because the district court denied a special instruction regarding the defendants? good faith reliance on their accountant?s advice...
Newman: Taking Child to Yemen Not "Otherwise Extensive" Offense
Posted on August 17, 2010In U.S. v. Newman, No. 09-14557 (Aug. 17, 2010), the Court affirmed the imposition of a sentence enhancement under USSG § 2J1.2(b)(2) for ?substantial interference with the administration of justice.? Newman was convicted of removing his child outside the United States with the intent to obstruct the other parent?s lawful exercise of parental rights...
Villarreal: 10-year delay not speedy trial violation
Posted on August 16, 2010In U.S. v. Villarreal, No. 09-11348 (Aug. 13, 2009), the Court rejected a constitutional speedy trial right challenge to an indictment, and affirmed a 328-month sentence on a defendant convicted of trafficking in more than 10,000 kilograms of marijuana...
Jackson: 3582(c)(2) does not encompass safety-valve
Posted on August 09, 2010In U.S. v. Jackson, No. 08-13645 (Aug. 9, 2010), the Court held that a defendant cannot obtain a safety-valve sentence reduction at a resentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).The Court noted that the safety-valve statute references findings ?at sentencing...
Epps: Pillowcase not protected by Fourth Amendment
Posted on August 09, 2010In U.S. v. Epps, No. 09-12285 (Aug. 6, 2010), the Court rejected a Fourth Amendment challenge to the police?s seizure of the contents of a pillow case.The defendant was running away after a bank robbery, pointing a gun toward the police. A police officer in a police car stopped him by hitting him with the front of his patrol car...
Mills: Mandatory Minimum Crack Offenders Not Eligible for Crack Amendment Reductions
Posted on August 05, 2010In U.S. v. Mills, No. 08-11760 (Aug. 5, 2010), the Court rejected the argument that defendants convicted of a crack cocaine offense who were originally subject to mandatory minimum sentences, but received substantial assistance sentence reductions below the mandatory minimums, could, in a proceeding for reduction of sentence under 18 U...
Irey: En Banc reversal of child molester sentence
Posted on August 02, 2010In U.S. v. Irey, No. 08-10997 (July 29, 2010) (en banc), the Court reversed as substantively unreasonable a sentence of 210 months, below the Guidelines advisory sentence (and statutory maximum) of 360 months, because the district court failed to adequately punish a sex offender convicted of coercing minors to engage in sexually explicit conduct outside the United States, in violation of 18 U...
Tome: One-year internet ban affirmed
Posted on July 27, 2010In U.S. v. Tome, No. 09-16486 (July 27, 2010), on review of a revocation of supervised release, the Court upheld the imposition of a 24-month sentence and a one-year internet ban as a condition of additional supervised release.The defendant, after admitting to possession of computer disks containing over 100,000 images of child pornography and being convicted of possessing child pornography, was released on supervised release...
Belfast: Charles Taylor's son convictions affirmed
Posted on July 21, 2010In U.S. v. Belfast, No. 09-10461 (July 15, 2010), in an 87-page opinion, the Court affirmed the torture convictions and 1,164-month sentence of the son of former Liberian President Charles Taylor.The Court rejected the argument that the torture statute, 18 U...
Hall: Teenager's Confession Not Coerced
Posted on July 21, 2010In Hall v. Thomas, No. 09-12729 (July 20, 2010), the Court denied habeas relief to an Alabama inmate sentenced to life imprisonment for robbery and kidnaping.The Court found that Hall, a juvenile, gave a voluntary confession. The Court recognized that Hall?s father was not present when his son was questioned by police, and that Hall claimed his confession was coerced, but noted that Hall?s audiotaped statement showed that he waived his Miranda rights, and indicated no coercion...
Snipes: Tax Evasion Convictions and Sentence Affirmed
Posted on July 20, 2010In U.S. v. Snipes, No. 08-12402 (July 16, 2010), the Court affirmed tax evasion convictions and a three-year sentence.The district court?s denied a venue transfer motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3237(b), because the motion was filed after this statute?s 20-day deadline...
Allen: Defendant Can Blame Counsel for His Own Litigation Decision
Posted on July 15, 2010In Allen v. Sec. Fla. Dep?t of Corrections, No. 09-13217 (July 14, 2010), the Court affirmed the denial of habeas relief to a Florida inmate sentenced to death for a 1991 murder.The Court rejected Allen?s argument that the Florida state courts incorrectly failed to consider the errors in his trial cumulatively...
Walker: No Clearly Established Crawford Rights In Civil Commitments
Posted on July 14, 2010In Walker v. Hadi, No. 09-15701 (June 4, 2010), the Court held that, in a habeas proceeding challenging a Florida civil commitment order classifying Walker as a sexually violent predator, Walker could not show error based on the violation of his right to cross- examine witnesses, under Crawford v...
Fontenot: Government Need Only Prove Federal Investigative Jurisdiction
Posted on July 14, 2010In U.S. v. Fontenot, No. 08-12266 (July 13, 2010), the Court, on plain error review, held that it was not erroneous, in a prosecution for making a false entry in a document with the intent to impede an investigation within the jurisdiction of a United States agency, in violation of 18 U...
Thompson: Manifest Injustice Standard applies to nonpreserved sufficiency challenge
Posted on July 09, 2010In U.S. v. Thompson, No. 08-13658 (July 8, 2010), the Court rejected sufficiency of the evidence challenges to multiple convictions of robberies and for using firearms in the course of those offenses.The Court noted that because, as to certain counts, the defendant failed to move at the close of the government?s case for judgments of acquittal, on appeal the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the convictions on those counts was not reviewed de novo, but only for ?manifest miscarriage of justice...
Marshall: Jury Override Not Arbitrary
Posted on June 29, 2010In Marshall v. Sec., Dep?t of Corrections, No. 09-15419 (June 28, 2010), the Court denied habeas relief to a Florida death-row inmate convicted of a 1988 murder.Marshall argued that when the Florida trial court overrode the jury?s recommendation of a life sentence, and sentenced him to death, it violated Florida?s rule limiting such overrides to cases where it was clear that virtually no reasonable person could differ...
Garcia-Cordero: "Bring and Present" Requirement does not violate Privilege
Posted on June 29, 2010In U.S. v. Garcia-Cordero, No. 09-10292 (June 29, 2010), the Court held that 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii), which imposes a duty on individuals transporting international passengers to ?bring and present? those passengers to appropriate immigration officers at a designated point of entry immediately upon arrival into the country, does not violate a defendant?s privilege against self-incrimination...
Rothenberg: Online chats are basis for sentence enhancements
Posted on June 29, 2010In U.S. v. Rothenberg, No. 08-17106 (June 29, 2010), the Court affirmed the sentence of a defendant who pled guilty to using a computer to induce an individual under 18 to engage in criminal sexual activity, and to possessing child pornography.The defendant argued that online chats in which he discussed with adults possible sexual acts with minors should not have been the basis for a sentence enhancement under the Guidelines...
Vining: Judge's Consultation of Extra-Record Evidence Not Prejudicial
Posted on June 29, 2010In Vining v. Sec. Dep?t of Corrections, No. 07-15681 (June 28, 2010), the Court denied habeas relief to a Florida inmate sentenced to death for a 1987 murder.The Court rejected Vining?s argument that he was denied a fair trial because the state trial court considered extra-record information...
Suggs: No Prejudice in Failure to Present Mental Deficit History
Posted on June 28, 2010In Suggs v. McNeil, No. 09-12718 (June 24, 2010), the Court affirmed the denial of habeas relief to a Florida inmate sentenced to death for a 1990 murder.The Court rejected the argument that the Florida Supreme Court unreasonably applied the prejudice prong of Strickland when it determined that counsel?s failure at the penalty phase to adequately present a defense based on Suggs? mental health did not prejudice the outcome...
Huff: Double-Recovery Victim Windfall Not Proper in Restitution
Posted on June 28, 2010In U.S. v. Huff, No. 08-16272 (June 25, 2010), the Court rejected the argument that the government proved multiple hub-and-spoke conspiracies, not a single conspiracy, but vacated a restitution order.Rejecting Huff?s conspiracy argument, the Court noted that the evidence showed that the defendants interacted with one another and with their co-conspirators...
Alexander: Firing Firearm from Vehicle is "Crime of Violence"
Posted on June 28, 2010In U.S. v. Alexander, No. 08-17062 (June 25, 2010), the Court held that a prior conviction under Fla. Stat. § 790.15(2) fo discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1,000 feet of another person qualified as a crime of violence under the career offender provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines...
DeYoung: No Habeas relief for 1993 murders
Posted on June 28, 2010In DeYoung v. Schofield, (09-10964), the Court affirmed the denial of habeas relief to a Georgia death-row inmate for the 1993 murder of his parents and sister.The Court rejected the argument that DeYoung?s counsel was deficient in failing to investigate his personal history, noting counsel?s investigation of potential witnesses...
Williams: Florida Battery does not Qualify for Career Offender
Posted on June 23, 2010In U.S. v. Williams, No. 08-10184 (June 22, 2010), on remand from the United States Supreme Court in light of Johnson v. U.S., 130 S.Ct. 1265 (2010), the Court held that a prior Florida State conviction for battery on a law enforcement officer did not qualify as a crime of violence for career offender sentencing purposes...
Gilbert: Career Offender Status Can be a Non-existent offense
Posted on June 23, 2010In Gilbert v. U.S., No. 09-12513 (June 21, 2010), the Court held that even though a defendant had filed a prior § 2255 challenge to career offender sentencing status, he was entitled to habeas relief based on his claim that his prior conviction for carrying a concealed weapon was no longer an offense that would qualify as a crime of violence, and that he therefore was wrongfully sentenced as a career offender...
Lall: Defendant's Statements Involuntary: Suppressed
Posted on June 01, 2010In U.S. v. Lall, No. 09-10794 (May 28, 2010), the Court held that a defendant did not make a voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights, and that his statements were involuntary. Because the government?s uses at trial of the statements and of the evidence derived from the statements were not harmless, the Court reversed the defendant?s conviction...
Previous | Next
Medical Malpractice: Your Case Is On The Trial Calendar-Can Defense Lawyers Talk to Your Doctor?
Your New York attorney has notified the Court that your case is re...
The Grave Risk of Harm Defense in Hague Child Abduction Cases
A major debate is under way as to the future of the “grave risk ...
New Baptist Covenant Blog
Last week, I pointed to the New Baptist Convenant website, now onl...
The Mexico Trucker Blog
I've written before about the perceived problems with relaxed rest...
Self Defense
It's legal to defend yourself and your family
My fiance's check is DD into a local credit union. Bank seems to have a pattern of "invisibly holding" charges from the debit card until just HOURS before his DD is processed (and this is after hours, of course). Over th
Have your fiance take the information you've collected and go into the bank...
It is my understanding that the 6th Amendment requires, that if you can't afford a lawyer in a criminal case, the Court must provide a lawyer in your defense at no charge to you. However, in a civil case no such protecti
That is not entirely true, even in the case of criminal cases. The court will pr...
I was called to give a deposition for the defense and the defendant is the person who stole our car, there is a chance that I will be called to satisfy at his trial. How can I get out of this, as my husband is to testify
If you were subpoenaed for the deposition you will need to appear or face prosec...
Is it libel to write blog posts and/or online reviews about a local business that defames one's reputation?
Libel is the form of defamation expressed in fixed-- usually written form. Sland...
How can I make my blog more popular?
You have to write and submit articles, with backlinks to your blogsite....

My fiance's check is DD into a local credit union. Bank seems to have a pattern of "invisibly holding" charges from the debit card until just HOURS before his DD is processed (and this is after hours, of course). Over th
Have your fiance take the information you've collected and go into the bank...
It is my understanding that the 6th Amendment requires, that if you can't afford a lawyer in a criminal case, the Court must provide a lawyer in your defense at no charge to you. However, in a civil case no such protecti
That is not entirely true, even in the case of criminal cases. The court will pr...
I was called to give a deposition for the defense and the defendant is the person who stole our car, there is a chance that I will be called to satisfy at his trial. How can I get out of this, as my husband is to testify
If you were subpoenaed for the deposition you will need to appear or face prosec...
Is it libel to write blog posts and/or online reviews about a local business that defames one's reputation?
Libel is the form of defamation expressed in fixed-- usually written form. Sland...
How can I make my blog more popular?
You have to write and submit articles, with backlinks to your blogsite....








