.

Google       

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402


Labor & Employment Law

California Employee Rights Blog California Employee Rights Blog

Information on California employee rights brought to you by Peters Law Group, APC.
By James Peters

Post Frequency: 0.3/day

Last Entry: July 08, 2010 at 16:11:33

Recent Entries: 53

Track this blog ()

Go to California Employee Rights Blog, find other Labor & Employment Law blogs, or browse all law blogs.

Search
This Blog Only All Blogs

Posts

Congress Tries to Legalize ?English Only? Workplace Policies

Posted on November 20, 2007
According to an article in today’s Los Angeles Times, Congressional Republicans are pushing to amend federal anti-discrimination laws to do away with the provision that prohibits employers from requiring employees to only speak English at work. Currently, under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act such an “English-only” policy is considered national origin discrimination...


NEVER E-mail Your Attorney From Work!

Posted on November 12, 2007
Sometimes employees use their employer’s e-mail address or computer to contact us. This is understandable, especially for long-term employees who spend most of their waking time at work or using a company-issued computer at home. The problem is that using an employer’s computer or e-mail address to communicate with your attorney might mean these communications [...


CA Supreme Court Considers Employees? Medical Marijuana Use

Posted on November 07, 2007
Yesterday the California Supreme Court heard arguments in Ross v. Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc. In this case, the employee was refused employment because his pre-employment drug test came back positive for marijuana. The employee had been using medical marijuana at the direction of his physician to deal with lower back strain and muscle spasms...


California Supreme Court Decides Lump Sum Expense Reimbursement is OK

Posted on November 06, 2007
Yesterday the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc., ruling that employers may reimburse employee expenses in the form of “additional wages” payable in a “lump sum” instead of reimbursing each separate expense for the exact amount incurred...


To access this complete feed in the blog feed reader login or register for free.

California Lowers Standards for Computer Software Professional Overtime Exemption

Posted on November 06, 2007
As explained in various posts on this blog, California employees are presumed to deserve overtime pay for any hours worked over 40 in one week or 8 in one day, even if they are paid a salary, unless the employer can prove that an exemption to that rule applies...


Schwarzenegger ?Terminates? Employee Rights (Part 3)-Family Values?

Posted on November 05, 2007
This is our final installment in a series dealing with employee rights laws that California’s legislature passed in 2007, but which Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed last month before they could take effect. SB 836 Senate Bill 836 was heralded nationwide as the first law prohibiting employer discrimination against employees based on their “family status”...


Schwarzenegger ?Terminates? Employee Rights (Part 2)-Difficult Choices

Posted on November 04, 2007
This is the second post in a series on several very important bills the California legislature passed in 2007 to protect employees that the Governor vetoed at the last possible moment last month. SB 537 Despite supporting a strong new law providing protected leave to military spouses whose husbands or wives are on leave from service, the [...


Schwarzenegger ?Terminates? Employee Rights (Part 1)-Why?

Posted on November 03, 2007
As the end of the year approached, Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed several employee protections the California legislature passed in 2007. While he felt it was important to give full protections to military spouses whose husbands or wives were on leave, he deemed other employees to be less deserving of similar rights...


California Passes Spousal Military Leave Law

Posted on November 02, 2007
California has passed a law providing employees whose spouses are on active military duty with protected leave from work to be with their spouses when they are on leave from duty. Governor Schwarzenegger signed Assembly Bill 392 into law last month and it became effective immediately...


We?re back!!

Posted on November 02, 2007
Hello again, everyone. I know that we have been MIA for awhile now, but a lot of changes have been going on at Peters Law Group. My wife and I welcomed our new son into the world, our firm relocated and I have had many time-consuming cases come to a head all at [...


Test Post

Posted on March 07, 2007
Testing


The ?No Bad Apples Rule?

Posted on March 05, 2007
Employers could avoid a LOT of lawsuits if they would just follow the “No Bad Apples Rule”, which has its origins in a book written by Dr. Robert Sutton called “The No Asshole Rule: Building a Civilized Workplace and Surviving One That Isn’t”...


Glass Ceiling is Still an Obstacle for Female Interviewees

Posted on March 04, 2007
Sometimes it is easy to forget that discrimination against women, minorities and (of course) minority women still occurs in this country. This might bring to mind examples where uneducated, unskilled women are denied employment and/or harassed by uneducated men who think of them as sex objects, such as in the movie North Country...


Q&A: Overtime Calculation with Two Different Hourly Rates

Posted on February 19, 2007
Q: My employer pays me at one rate of pay for my regular work, but then pays me minimum wage for travel and attending seminars after-hours. How is my overtime supposed to be calculated? –Bad at Math (CA) A: Calculating overtime for an hourly employee who is paid at two separate hourly rates is [...


Military Leaves from Work Heavily Protected

Posted on February 15, 2007
One of the strongest job protections for employees in the United States is for those who take a leave of absence to serve in the armed forces. I have seen a dramatic increase in these claims in just the past year and I recently filed a federal lawsuit for a client in San Francisco [...


Why Wal-Mart Employees Should Consider NOT Accepting Settlement

Posted on January 26, 2007
Yesterday, it was reported that Wal-Mart had reached a settlement with the Department of Labor to settle unpaid overtime claims by its employees. The odd thing about this settlement is that Wal-Mart turned itself in to the Department of Labor and negotiated a quick settlement with the government and the employees had no say in what [...


Q&A: Restrictions on Bad References by Former Employers

Posted on January 25, 2007
Q: I quit my last job because my boss would not stop asking me out on dates. Now I am having a really tough time finding a new position. Every time I go through an interview they seem to love me, but then it falls through once they start checking my references...


Commissioned Salespeople & Overtime, Part 4: Final Words

Posted on January 21, 2007
Although this series on commissioned salespeople and overtime might not be the most exciting employment law topic, for those with large unpaid claims, it probably is the most exciting. I leave this topic with the following points. Minimum Wage Test The final test that must be met before commissioned salespeople can be considered “exempt” from overtime [...


Commissioned Salespeople & Overtime, Part 3: Qualified Employer?

Posted on January 21, 2007
Even if you meet the criteria to be classified as “exempt” from overtime pay as a commissioned salesperson, the business your employer is engaged in can also automatically qualify you for overtime, regardless of how you are paid. Commissioned salespeople can only be “exempt” if their employer is a “retail or service establishment”...


Commissioned Salespeople & Overtime, Part 2: Are You ?Commissioned??

Posted on January 18, 2007
In order for an employee to qualify as “exempt” from overtime pay as a commissioned salesperson, the main test that must be met is the employee MUST make more than 50% of their wages in the form of “commissions”. This test is not as straightforward as it might sound at first...


Commissioned Salespeople & Overtime, Part 1: ?How much??

Posted on January 18, 2007
This is the first in a series of posts dealing specifically with the issue of commissioned salespeople and unpaid overtime. This is an area most employees, many employers, and even a large percentage of California attorneys do not understand correctly...


Employers? Calculation of Overtime Hours Often Incorrect

Posted on January 17, 2007
Employers and employees are often confused about how many hours an employee must work before overtime must be paid. California law is more complicated than most states on this point, but it is also much more generous to employees than most. Employers must pay all non-exempt employees overtime at the rate of time-and-one-half for all [...


Overtime Rate MUST Include Bonuses and Commissions in Calculation

Posted on January 17, 2007
Employers, either through ignorance or intentionally, often make big mistakes in calculating overtime rates of pay for their employees and these often turn into big claims by the employees for unpaid wages later on. Overtime Rate NOT Just 1...


Previous
Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Bulletins

Related Law Articles

Related Law Questions
Related Searches
















US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!











0.0243 secs