Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> LawPundit
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: LawPunditCopyright Infringement: Are IP Addresses People? England and Wales Patent County Court Says P2P Illegal File Sharing Does Not Mean Subscriber Did It: But What About Imputed Liability?
By Andis Kaulins
His Honour Judge Birss QC points to the obviously trite fact that owning an IP address is not foolproof proof that the subscriber did it, analogizing to the ownership of a printer as no proof that the printer is being used for copyright infringement by the printer owner. Why, "anybody" might have access to that hardware.
However, dear judge, there is the concept of responsibility of ownership, variously referred to in the law as vicarious or imputed liability for ownership negligence. If a car you own is involved in a leaving-the-scene accident, it is generally presumed that the registered owner or designated driver or an authorized agent was the driver, unless it can be proven that someone unauthorized was driving the car or reasonable doubt about the driver exists. If a certain printer or IP address belonging or traceable by possession to you is being used for copyright infringement -- and you did not do it - then who did?
This is a simple problem at law in which the burden of proof should simply be shifted to the the owner or person to whom an IP address is registered, assigned or otherwise traced, who is then responsible for proving who was using it or casting sufficient doubt about the matter to escape an assessment of culpability.
Asking a 3rd party to be able to determine "usage" is nonsense. The law has some obligation to be sensible and to look for the simplest sane solutions.
Hence, we can not support this wayward court decision in any way and would suggest to the legal beagles in England and Wales that they put this matter into better jurisprudential and legislative order.
Full post as published by LawPundit on February 15, 2011 (boomark / email).
Illegal Immigrant Responsibility and Reform Act of 1996
Explanation of the controversial illegal immigration law
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Dumb Foreign Laws
Stupid Laws of Other Countries
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
ASMP and Other Visual Artists File Class Action Lawsuit Against Google
Google Faces Class Action for Copyright Infringement
Comcast Agrees Tentative $16 Million Settlement in Consumer File Sharing Class Action
Comcast Agrees Tentative $16 Million Settlement in Consumer File Sharing Class Action
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Spike Lee and Showtime
Settlement reached in script copyright infringement lawsuit.

Irish ISP Agrees to Three-Strikes Policy for File-Sharers
Taiwan Passes Three-Strikes Anti-P2P law
Digital Britain: Government vows to cut illegal file-sharing by 70%
Aussie Movie & TV Industry Sues ISP for Allowing P2P Piracy
Swedish Gov't Mulls New Anti-File-Sharing Law








