Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Disability Law Blogs -> Florida Workers’ Compensation Law Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Disability Law
: Florida Workers’ Compensation Law Blog"Special Hazard" Exception to the "Going and Coming" Rule Applies Where Employee Uses "Usual" or "Expected" Route to Work
By David A. McCranie, Esq.
In order to be compensable under the Florida Workers' Compensation Law, the employee's accident must have been sustained while he was "in the course of" his employment. Under what has become known as the "going and coming rule," the employee is not considered to be "in the course of" his employment when he is injured in an accident sustained while going to work or while coming home from work. But there are exceptions to the "going and coming" rule, one of which is the "special hazard" exception, that is, an accident will be compensable even if it is sustained while "going to" or "coming from" work if it is caused by a "special hazard" on a "normal and customary route" used by the employee as a means of entry to and exit from the workplace.
In Kramer v. Palm Beach County, decided on 3/31/2008, the claimant was a bridge tender who habitually parked his car in the morning at a nearby shopping center and walked the remainder of the way to work. He was injured when he tripped over a pile of debris while walking from his car to the jobsite. The JCC concluded that the accident was not compensable because of the "going and coming" rule, but the First DCA disagreed. The Court held that the "special hazard" rule applies if the injury occurs as the result of a "special hazard" encountered on a route that is either the "usual" or "expected" route. While the JCC's order demonstrated that Kramer did not use the "expected" route (the employer had provided alternative parking facilities instead of the shopping center parking lot), the order was silent on whether the route he took was the "usual" route. There was evidence that many of Kramer's fellow employees had continued to park in the shopping center parking lot even after the employer provided the alternative parking facilities. The Court remanded that case to the JCC for specific findings on whether the route Kramer took was the "usual" route to the jobsite.
Full post as published by Florida Workers’ Compensation Law Blog on March 31, 2008 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Stacy Schneider
Stacy Schneider offers to be Britney Spears Lawyer for Free
Mattel and Fisher-Price Toy Recall
Magnets and Lead Paint manufactured in China Create Poisoning and Health Hazard
Employee Lawsuits (An Introduction and Topic Overview)
How employers can cope with the siege of employee lawsuits
Employee Lawsuits: Negligent Hiring and Retention
Employers must check references, criminal records, other background material.
Work Visas
Types of work permits
Unsafe Work Site
Employee awarded $2.5 million personal injury settlement after suffering burns to his lower body.
Mars Petcare
Issues Recall of Special Kitty Gourmet in 15 States
Arkansas Nucor Plant Guilty of a Racially Hostile Work Environment
Nucor Guilty Of Racially Hostile Work Environment Must Pay $1.2 Million Settlement
Railroad Workers
concerning the growing number of work-related injuries in the railroad industry.
Suffocation Hazard Prompts Recall of Play Yards with Bassinets
Dorel Play Yards with Bassinets Recalled due to Suffocation Hazard
Lexmark to Pay $8.3M in Employee Vacation Class Action
Lexmark to Pay $8.3M in Employee Vacation Class Action

Nev. Supreme Court issues 2 opinions
COA Applies Heightened Pleading Standard To Wrongful Discharge Case
An Employee Handbook I Can Support
USCIS ANNOUNCES KEY H-1B CAP PROCESS CHANGES
VA: Exclusionary rule applies in probation revocation proceedings









