Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Criminal Law Blogs -> Fourth Amendment
OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Criminal Law
: Fourth AmendmentVA: Exclusionary rule applies in probation revocation proceedings
By John Wesley Hall, Jr.
ADVERTISEMENTS
Exclusionary rule applies in probation revocation proceedings because of defendant's allegation that the officer acted in bad faith. Logan v. Commonwealth, 2008 Va. LEXIS 92 (September 12, 2008):
We conclude that the Court of Appeals' reliance on Scott is misplaced based upon three relevant distinctions between Scott and the present case. First, Scott involved a parolee, rather than a probationer, 524 U.S. at 360, and parolees "have fewer expectations of privacy than probationers, because parole is more akin to imprisonment than probation is to imprisonment," Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843, 850, 126 S. Ct. 2193, 165 L. Ed. 2d 250 (2006). Second, the parolee in Scott had explicitly consented to a search of the house and his person as a condition of parole...continue to full postFull post as published by Fourth Amendment on September 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Related Law Articles
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Lawsuits and Settlements
Class Action Filed Against Banks in Foreclosure Proceedings
Class Action Filed Against Banks in Foreclosure Proceedings
Probation User Fees
Clark County Council pays $1.1 million settlement after misappropriating funds.
Related Searches
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.

Is the Exclusionary Rule Consistent With Originalism:
Why Does the United States Have an Exclusionary Rule:
Originalism Does Not Support an Exclusionary Rule
Response to Paul on Originalism and the Exclusionary Rule:
UT: Exclusionary rules does not apply to DL suspension proceedings
Another Pilshaw reversal [NOT FINAL]








