Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Ethics Blogs -> Legal Ethics Forum
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Ethics
: Legal Ethics ForumScalia dissents from denial of cert in case where death penalty was reversed because of defense counsel's decision not to make a closing argument
Dissent here. Of course, Justice Scalia's offering only his side of the analysis, but it's interesting to think about the reasons that a criminal defense lawyer might deliberately waive closing argument -- here, apparently because counsel thought it would result in no closing by the prosecution.
Full post as published by Legal Ethics Forum on December 13, 2010 (boomark / email).
Self Defense
It's legal to defend yourself and your family
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Military Veterans Benefits
How to obtain full range of benefits for veterans and dependnets
Jevic Transportation
allegedly failing to give 60 days warning before closing plant.
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty
RC2 Corp to Pay $1.25 Million Civil Penalty >
Albertsons et al.
allegedly injected dye into farm raised salmon to make it appear more palatable.
Holiday Inn Express
Complimentary simplySmartâ„¢ "Remove" Make Up Remover Recalled
CIA
Department of Defense Sued by Veterans
Ministry of Defense
$500,000 in damages in transgender humiliation suit.

An SCOTUS exchange in a cert. denial concerning a long stay on death row
Dissent from cert denial in habeas case involving judicial comment on evidence
The Scalia vs. Stevens Opinion Concerning the Death Penalty
More Inflammatory Closing Argument
Belmontes v. Ayers (9th Cir. - Dec. 30, 2008)









