Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Politics Blogs -> Sunlight Foundation
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Politics
: Sunlight FoundationSenate Judiciary Committee to Ponder Court Transparency
By Daniel Schuman
The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold an executive business meeting on Thursday to evaluate a trio of bills aimed at opening up courtrooms to television cameras. When it comes to directing some sunlight at the courts, there are many more transparency measures to consider.
For example, the Supreme Court’s website is still in need of dramatic improvement. Only the most recent opinions are available from the Court, merits and certiorari briefs are generally (if not entirely) unavailable, and the site does not incorporate modern updating techniques like RSS and XML. The Court’s recent website redesign slightly improves its functionality, but there’s a long long way to go. In addition, the Court should release audio recordings of argument the same day they occur, not require folks to get them from the National Archives after the end of the Term.
Although many of the lower courts do a better job than the Supreme Court, they too could spiff up and make more user-friendly the information they provide to the public. And the pay-per-use PACER system, whereby the public is charged to access their own court documents, should be made available to the public for free.
For the record, the legislation the Judiciary Committee will consider includes:
- A measure to televise all open sessions of the Supreme Court unless a majority of justices decides doing so violates due process rights (S. 446)
- A measure expressing the Senate’s opinion that open Court sessions should be televised (S. Res. 339)
- A measure granting appellate and district court judges the ability to allow photos, electronic recording, and broadcasting of court proceedings (S. 657).
Hopefully, these measures will prompt a committee hearing, and provide a foundation to examine how the courts make information available to the public.
Thanks to Eric Naing for his assistance with this blogpost.
Full post as published by Sunlight Foundation on April 27, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007
Strengthens examination requirements of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

Rush Limbaugh Impersonator Joins Senate Judiciary Committee
Improving Detainee Policy: Testimony before Senate Judiciary Committee on June 4
Sotomayor is Endorsed by Senate Judiciary Committee
Breaking: Senate Judiciary Committee Votes Yay on Sotomayor
Ind. Courts - Senate Judiciary committee reassigns Court bills during hearing
Right Now: Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on Iqbal







