Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Kentucky Blogs -> LawReader
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Kentucky
: LawReaderU.S. SUPREME COURT, REINSTATES CLASS ACTION SUIT THAT ACCUSES ALLSTATE OF ROUTINELY REFUSING TO PAY INTEREST WHEN IT IS LATE WITH A BENEFIT PAYMENT
By Stan
Full post as published by LawReader on April 02, 2010 (boomark / email).
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Heartland Payment Systems
Faces Class Action
Preliminary $1M Settlement Reached in Bell Canada Late Fees Class Action
Preliminary $1M Settlement Reached in Bell Canada Late Fees Class Action
Allstate Settles Bad-Faith Insurance Suit for $4 Million
Allstate Settles Bad-Faith Insurance Suit for $4 Million
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
Auto Financing
Credit Acceptance Corp. agrees to $52.1 million class action settlement after overcharging consumers for fees and interest on automobile installment contracts.
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules

Allstate settles class-action suit in Washington state
9th Circuit Reinstates Suit on Gays in Military
Supreme Court rules states cannot limit federal class action suits
U.S. Class Action Suit Puts Brakes On Toyota
New Mexico High Court Upholds Multi-State Class Action
"California Supreme Court revives class-action suit against tobacco firms"







