Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How Appealing"California Supreme Court revives class-action suit against tobacco firms"
You can access today's ruling of the Supreme Court of California at this link.
At "The UCL Practitioner" blog, Kimberly A. Kralowec has this lengthy post featuring highlights from the ruling.
Full post as published by How Appealing on May 18, 2009 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Mesothelioma Law Suit
Asbestos Exposure
Whole Foods
And Other Firms Sued by California Attorney General,
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Facing Potential Class Action
Seattle Mortgage Co Faces California Class Action
Seattle Mortgage Co Faces California Class Action
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
California Talent Agency, Be Productions, Faces Federal Class Action
California Construction Workers
Seek Class Action Against BMHC
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

"California Supreme Court revives class-action suit against tobacco firms"
Oregon Supreme Court Requires Harm in Tobacco Suit
California Channel to televise argument in In re Tobacco II Cases
California Supreme Court Issues Decision on UCL Standing Issues in In re Tobacco II Cases
Federal Judge Finds Engle Tobacco Order Violates Due Process









