Home -> Law Blog Directory -> New York Blogs -> New York Civil Law
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
New York
: New York Civil LawNew York Court of Appeals Will Hear Oral Arguments on Whether to Extend Primary Assumption of Risk
By Matthew Lerner
For its February Session, the New York Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in Trupia v. Lake George Central School Dist. The appeal concerns whether the Court should extend primary assumption of risk beyond the context of sporting and entertainment activities.
The injured infant in Trupia attempted to slide down his school's bannister and fell on his head, fracturing his skull and sustaining a brain injury and retrograde amnesia. The infant and his father commenced an action against the school. After discovery and the filing of the note of issue, the defendant school moved to amend its answer to assert the affirmative defense of primary assumption of risk.
Primary assumption of risk acts as a total bar to liability based on the defendant's alleged negligence. Since the enactment of the comparative fault statute, primary assumption of risk has typically only applied in cases where the plaintiff was involved in a sporting or entertainment activity.
The Appellate Division, Third Department reversed the trial court's grant of the defendant's motion to amend its answer. The Court concluded that the defense was devoid of merit because primary assumption of risk did not apply to the injured infant's activity. The court rejected the defendant's argument that the Second Department and Fourth Department had extended primary assumption of risk beyond the sporting activity and entertainment activity context (Sy v. Kopet (the plaintiff injured while attempting to enter room through second floor window) and Lamandia-Cochi v. Tulloch (the plaintiff was injured while attempting to slide down wooden bannister).
The Court will resolve this conflict between the Appellate Division Departments and clarify the assumption of risk that frequently eludes attorneys.
New York Civil Law will keep you apprised of the developments on this appeal.
Full post as published by New York Civil Law on February 01, 2010 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Dumb New York Laws
Stupid Laws in the Empire State
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
New York Building Codes
Building and constructions laws in New York
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Oral HRT
More Than Doubles the Risk of Blood Clots
New York Employment Law
alleged violations of New York employment law.
Immigrant SSI
US Federal Government agrees to extend benefits in class action settlement.
Blood Clots
Associated with Oral Contraceptives Yaz and Yasmin
PPH
alleging Fen-Phen and other drugs cause primary pulmonary hypertension.

COAKY ARGS: Kentucky Court of Appeals to hear oral arguments May 14 in Prestonsburg
Court of Appeals to hold oral argument in Shelbyville
AOC NEWS: Kentucky Court of Appeals to hear oral arguments Sept. 29 in Highland Heights
Court of Appeals to hear oral arguments in Murry on Oct. 14th. - see docket
ARGS: COA To Hear Oral Arguments at Stanton on Jan 14, 2008; Public invited
AOC NEWS: Kentucky Court of Appeals to hear oral arguments April 24 and 25 in Covington








