ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Kentucky Blogs -> Kentucky Cases

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Kentucky

: Kentucky Cases

ARGS: COA To Hear Oral Arguments at Stanton on Jan 14, 2008; Public invited

By Michael Stevens

ADVERTISEMENTS

Kentucky Court of Appeals to hear oral arguments in two cases Jan. 14 in Stanton

FRANKFORT, Ky. -- The Kentucky Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in a civil case and a worker?s compensation case Wednesday, Jan. 14, at the Powell County Courthouse in Stanton. Proceedings are open to the public.

A three-judge panel consisting of Court of Appeals Judges Denise G. Clayton, Joy A. Moore and Janet L. Stumbo will hear oral arguments starting at 10 a.m. in the civil case Holly Creek Production Corporation v. Robert Rose, which is on appeal from Wolfe County. It will hear arguments in Maimouna Barry v. U.S. Airways Group, Inc. et al., a worker?s compensation case, at 10:45 a.m. Proceedings will take place in the Circuit Courtroom of the courthouse, which is located at 525 Washington St.

A docket containing summaries of the cases is below.

STANTON DOCKET

Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2009

10 AM   2008CA000260
             HOLLY CREEK PRODUCTION CORPORATION v. ROBERT ROSE

Summary: Civil. Interlocutory appeal of the trial court?s decision to grant summary judgment to appellee. Case issues involved breach of an expressed covenant and injunctive relief.

Wolfe County judge who ruled in the case ? Judge Frank Allen Fletcher

Appellant?s attorneys: Stephen G. Allen, Jennifer Ellen Drust and Ashley W. Ward

Appellee?s attorneys: Christopher M. Davis and Brian Neal Thomas

10:45 AM   2008CA001811
                  MAIMOUNA BARRY v. U.S. AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. ET AL.

Summary: Worker?s compensation. At issue is whether the appellant was acting in the scope of her employment when she was involved in a traffic accident. Does the going and coming rule apply to the appellant?

Judge who ruled in the case ? Judge John A. Gardner

Appellant?s attorney: William Daniel Nefzger

Appellees? attorneys: Joel W. Aubrey, Dwight T. Lovan and Marcel Smith

Full post as published by Kentucky Cases on January 06, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0134 secs (new cache)