Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Georgia Injury Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Georgia Injury Lawyer BlogNew Supreme Court Decision Makes It More Diffcult For Georgia Lawyers To Sue Medical Device And Drug Companies In Product-Injury Claims
Last Wednesday the Supreme Court of the United States made it harder for injury and wrongful death victims to sue manufacturers of federally approved medical devices. This decision will also impact cases involving dangerous drugs. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the Estate of Charles Riegel could sue a company under state law over a medical device which had previously been cleared for sale by federal regulators. Under federal law, a company must prove the safety and effectiveness of a medical device before the United States Food and Drug Administration will approve it for the marketplace. In an 8 to 1 decision, the Court ruled against the Estate of the injured patient who suffered serious injuries when a catheter burst during a medical procedure. As a result of this Supreme Court decision, state lawsuits are barred to the extent that they might impose requirements that are different from federal requirements. In other words Federal law will prempt state law where the two are in conflict or different. Not surprisingly, the Bush Administration sided with the medical device industry, saying unfavorable state jury verdicts would force companies to alter product designs or product labels that had already gotten FDA approval. This case is bad news for people injured by defective medical devices. The fallout from last week?s Supreme Court decision in this case will no doubt be felt throughout the country. Attorneys with cases pending against device makers such as Medtronic, Stryker and Johnson & Johnson expect these companies to file Motions to Dismiss the lawsuits which are currently pending. Lawyers also are concerned that this ruling may prompt judges to dismiss product-injury lawsuits before injured plaintiffs can gain access to data that might prove that the companies used false or misleading data to get government approval to market the devices.
Full post as published by Georgia Injury Lawyer Blog on February 28, 2008 (boomark / email).
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Birth Injury - Birth Injury Malpractice, Birth Injury Lawyer, Birth Injury Claims
Birth Injury alleging injuries resulting at birth from medical malpractice or negligence.
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Patent Infringement
Cardia agrees to pay $2.25 million settlement in medical device lawsuit.
Pre-Existing Conditions
Insurance companies to pay over $2.1 million settlement in claims lawsuit.
VA Medical Centers
Admit to Drug Overdoses, Software Glitches
Virgin Atlantic Flight
Makes Emergency Landing

Supreme Court decision could threaten state product liability claims
Supreme Court Medical Device Manufacturers
Riegel v. Medtronic: New England Journal of Medicine Editorial
SCOTUS rules on medical device preemption
FDA Proposes New Dangers: Removing the Right to Sue
House Investigates Defective Medical Device Protections







