ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> International Law Blogs -> China Hearsay

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

International Law

: China Hearsay

M&A Borrowing for the Volvo Deal

By Stan

ADVERTISEMENTS

Geely, the Chinese carmaker tagged as the preferred bidder for Ford Motor’s Volvo unit, is seeking at least $1 billion in loans from Chinese banks to finance its $1.8 billion bid, sources said on Tuesday.

At least three major Chinese banks including Bank of China, China Construction Bank and Export-Import Bank of China had agreed to extend loans to Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said the banking sources briefed on the plan.

“Money is not a problem for Geely,” said a source. “They definitely have strong support from Chinese banks and there are a number of private equity funds queuing up to invest in Geely.”

Export-Import Bank of China is a policy lender wholly owned by the Chinese government and directly led by the cabinet. Bank of China is China’s top foreign exchange lender. China Construction Bank is the country’s No 1 property lender. (China Daily)

Not so exciting, in and of itself. Most folks have found the other recent news on this deal (that Geely would not be getting Volvo technology) a lot more interesting.

However, this caught my eye because of what was not in the article. No mention was made about whether this funding had anything to do with recent government regulations concerning funding of M&A deals by domestic lenders.

Knowing that this deal involves not only a famous international brand, but it will also result in strengthening one of China’s key industries, I’m gonna assume that this was seen quite favorably by the top guys here in Beijing. Once that happens, I suppose it doesn’t matter what legal framework is utilized to process the financing. However, if this deal does technically fall within the scope of the new rules, it would be interesting to know.

Maybe some Net surfing is in order. If I come up with anything, I will update accordingly.


Tags: ,

© Stan for China Hearsay, 2009. | Permalink | 2 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags:

Full post as published by China Hearsay on December 01, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0153 secs (new cache)