Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Threat Level
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Intellectual Property Law
: Threat LevelIt?s Baaaack ? Appeals Court Resurrects SCO Lawsuit
By David Kravets
A federal appeals court on Monday ruled that the SCO Group has a right to a jury trial on its claim that it owns the Unix operating system, a ruling that could lead to renewed legal entanglements for Unix’s open-source cousin, Linux.
The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court judge who had ruled against SCO in 2007, a decision that suspended an aggressive legal campaign by the company.
In 1995, SCO Group (then known as Santa Cruz Operation) bought the Unix operating system from Novell for $149 million. But which company owned the copyrights wasn?t clear, and years of litigation ensued. SCO Group filed for bankruptcy two years ago after a Utah federal judge said SCO Group — considered a Utah-based copyright troll by the open source community — was not the owner despite the $149 million deal.
While the case ground through the courts, SCO Group tried to collect licensing fees from some 1,500 corporate Linux users, claiming that portions of Linux are based on Unix, and thus violated SCO Group?s copyrights. Novell did not make a similar claim.
Monday’s ruling could revive SCO’s separate high-stakes lawsuit against IBM. SCO Group is seeking more than $1 billion from Big Blue on allegations it used SCO-copyrighted Unix code in its Linux-based systems. The case was sidelined after the Utah federal judge said SCO group didn’t own the copyrights at issue.
Still, the copyright fight is far from being settled.
The appellate court, without taking any sides, ordered a jury trial to determine whether SCO Group properly owned the Unix and UnixWare copyrights. The court, in short, said the case was too close to call without a trial.
“We take no position on which party ultimately owns the Unix copyrights or which copyrights were required for Santa Cruz to exercise its rights under the agreement,” the court wrote. “Such matters are for the finder of fact on remand.”
See Also:
- Wired 12.07: The Linux Killer
- SCO Says Microsoft Memo Is Legit
- SCO: Buy License, Avoid Suit
- SCO Slaps IBM With Injunction
- Open-Source Crowd Irked by SCO
- Battered SCO Files for Bankruptcy to Stay Afloat
- Inside the Mind of the Man Who Tried to Milk Linux
Full post as published by Threat Level on August 24, 2009 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

Appeals Court Revives Rendition Lawsuit
Appeals Court Upholds Dismissal of Cycling Lawsuit
Court Rules Malpractice Suit Should Proceed
Federal appeals court dismisses lawsuit over Florida Democratic primary









