ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Recording Industry vs The People

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Copyright Law

: Recording Industry vs The People

Court sets new schedule in SONY v. Tenenbaum and cancels February 24th hearing [#RIAA]

By Ty Rogers and Ray Beckerman

ADVERTISEMENTS

In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, the Court has cancelled the hearing scheduled for tomorrow and made the following rulings:

-the defendant must make a dismissal motion by March 9, 2009, based upon its unconstitutionality defense;

-no conversations among counsel can be tape recorded without the consent of all of the participants;

-discovery relating to the claims and discovery relating to the counterclaims are bifurcated; discovery relating to the claims may proceed; discovery relating to the counterclaims is stayed;

-the substantive motions relating to the counterclaims and unconstitutionality defense (the proceedings which the Court ruled could be televised) are adjourned to April 30, 2009, at 10:00 A.M.;

-the pending discovery motions will all be decided upon the papers, without oral argument;

-initial disclosures and expert disclosures are due March 30, 2009;

-each party may take up to 5 additional depositions, not counting expert depositions, but no party may be deposed who has previously been deposed except with the permission of the Court;

-all discovery must be completed by May 30, 2009; and

-if the unconstitutionality dismissal motion is denied, the parties should expect to go to trial by the end of June.

At the end of the order, the Court made the following comment:

For the period from August 7, 2007 until September 22, 2008, defendant Joel Tenenbaum was not represented by counsel. The Court understands that a pro se litigant may not be familiar with the Court's Rules and, during that time, took this into account in construing his submissions. Tenenbaum, however, is now represented by counsel -- accordingly, familiarity with the both the Federal Rules and the Local Rules of the District of Massachusetts is presumed and expected.

February 23, 2009, Order

Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing music movies indie independent label freeculture creative commons pop/rock artists riaa independent mp3 cd favorite songs intellectual property portable music player

Full post as published by Recording Industry vs The People on February 23, 2009 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0126 secs (new cache)