Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> a View from the property line
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
: a View from the property linePART 2: No Duty* to Halt Perceived Nuisances OUTSIDE of the Subdivision
By William G. Gammon
For instance, there was a Texas Appeals court case ruled on late last year whereby a coalition of homeowner-members of an association sued the association and a third-party developer to block the sale of a recreational park located adjacent to the subdivision in question. The association desired to sell the park, as it was record title holder to the property, to the third-party developer for use as a commercial enterprise. Furthermore, the park itself was not located within the boundaries of the subdivision proper. However, the deed restrictions on file for the subdivision included a specific reference to the recreational park and its prohibition against commercial use, even though the park was not included geographically in the subdivision. Likewise, the recorded map for the subdivision showed a designated "recreation area" which all parties agreed was the same park now in dispute.
The Court ruled that the deed restrictions, plat and subdivision map on file with the county all served to put prospective purchasers on notice that the park was to be used only for a recreational area and that commercial use was prohibited. The Court ruled further that the deed restrictions for the subdivision "demonstrated a plan of development" that imposed restrictions on property that was not included in the subdivision's boundaries. Thus, the homeowners prevailed and the sale of the park to the commercial developer was blocked. The Court's ruling implicitly found that the Association would have to safeguard the recreational use of the park even though the park existed outside the boundaries of the subdivision.
Now granted, this is a very narrow instance of extra-territorial jurisdiction applying to a community's deed restrictions; but, the ultimate lesson to be learned here is that sometimes additional scrutiny of an Association's dedicatory instruments is warranted when questions of deed restriction enforcement outside the borders of the subdivision arise. Do not just assume that because a nuisance or other issue exists outside the geographic bounds of the neighborhood, the Association can dismiss or otherwise ignore the deed restrictions that govern it.
Full post as published by a View from the property line on October 21, 2008 (boomark / email).
Torts
Introduction to Torts
Boat Crash
Police officer awarded $100,000 settlement after crashing into bridge piling while on duty.
New York City
$1.5 million settlement after a family of four was killed by an off duty drunken police officer.
Motorcycle Cop Accident
Erie police officer awarded $150,000 workers compensation settlement after sustaining serious injuries while on duty.
Apeks Scuba Diving Regulator
Recalled Due To Missing Part
Ellsworth School District
4.4% increase in salaries as part of contract settlement.
Tyson Foods
Donates Chickens as Part of Class Action Settlement

PENDING: Senate Bill 235 (Set procedure for changing certain subdivision green space)
LAWLAPALOOZE: The Cardinal Lawyer: Elvis Cardozo and the Attractive Nuisances
Neighbors Challenge Plans For 77-Foot Cross At Prayer Garden
Maine Supreme Court Finds Adjacent Landowner Timely Appealed Building Permit in Family Subdivision
Commission Exceeded its Authority in Denying Subdivision Application








