Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Real Estate & Property Law Blogs -> Law of the Land
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Real Estate & Property Law
: Law of the LandPA Commonwealth Court Explains Merger Doctrine and Finds No Evidence of Intent to Maintain Nonconforming Lots in Single and Separate Ownership
By Patty Salkin
Full post as published by Law of the Land on August 20, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Merger Agreement Rejected
Finish Line and Genesco reach $175 million settlement in merger dispute.
Bunn-O-Matic
Recalls Single Cup Tea/Coffeemakers
Bank Website Security
New Report Finds Widespread Flaws
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.
allegedly failed to give policyholders discounted rates to which they were entitled.
Ownership Transfer
Amsol to pay $5.625 million settlement in buyout lawsuit.
Nationwide Recall Of All Lots Of Tylenol Arthritis Pain 100 Count With Ez-Open Cap
Tylenol Arthritis Pain 100 Count With Ez-Open Cap All Lots Recalled Nationally

Oral disclaimer of ownership during search or premises was not abandonment
Sufficient Evidence Supported Conviction
Are Merger Regulations Diluting Parliamentary Intent
Should Intent Be a Separate Element of an Abuse of Market Dominance
A Fading Legal Precedent: The Merger Doctrine
Supreme Court Relies On Original Intent









