Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Patent Law Blogs -> Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Patent Law
: Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement UpdatesAppellate Court Upholds $94 Million Patent Infringement Judgment for TiVo
By Philip Brooks
The following excerpt is from an Irell & Manella LLP press release issued today, February 1, 2008, and appearing at PR Newswire:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. has upheld a $94 million ruling in favor of digital video recorder pioneer TiVo Inc. in its patent infringement suit against EchoStar Communications Corp.
Law firm Irell & Manella LLP represented TiVo in both the original trial and the appeal, and was joined on appeal by members of the Washington office of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP and Ropes & Gray LLP.
In a unanimous ruling written by Judge William Bryson, the three-judge panel affirmed an April 13, 2006 jury verdict in Marshall, Texas that EchoStar had willfully infringed TiVo's patent on its innovative "time-warp" technology for digital video recorders (known as DVRs). The appellate decision also upheld all damages claims against EchoStar, as well as a key injunction preventing EchoStar from using TiVo's technology.
The appellate court also sent the case back to the district court to decide additional damages for the period the injunction was stayed pending appeal.
The court overturned a finding of infringement by the hardware used by EchoStar, which will have no practical effect on damages or the overall outcome.
See the full press release here.
Full post as published by Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Updates on February 01, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
The Princeton Review
$2.6 million settlement reached in patent infringement case.
Underground Piping
Insituform Technologies awarded $4.5 million patent infringement settlement.

Court Upholds $21M Patent Infringement Verdict Against Nintendo
Infringement of two claims and $74 million in damages affirmed, injunction reinstated
Maker of Blackberry Devices Facing New Patent Infringement Challenge








