Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How Appealing"Court won't save porn law, alters immunity rule"
And in early news coverage, The Associated Press reports that "Supreme Court won't revive online content law"; "Court rules for young girl in sex harassment case"; "Court sides with union in legal fees case"; "Court sides with police officers in search case"; and "Court reinstates Wash. murder conviction."
And Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that "U.S. Supreme Court Won't Revive Internet Pornography Measure" and "U.S. Supreme Court rejects Hamilton Bancorp ex-chairman's appeal."
The U.S. Supreme Court today issued four opinions in argued cases and one summary reversal.
The summary reversal issued in Spears v. United States, No. 08-5721. You can access the Court's per curiam ruling at this link. The Chief Justice issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. joined. Justice Clarence Thomas noted his dissent without opinion. And Justice Anthony M. Kennedy also did not join in the summary reversal, noting that he "would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and set the case for oral argument."
Justice Alito delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Comm., No. 07-1125. You can access the ruling at this link and the oral argument transcript at this link.
Justice Alito also delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Pearson v. Callahan, No. 07-751. You can access the ruling at this link and the oral argument transcript at this link.
Justice Stephen G. Breyer delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Locke v. Karass, No. 07-610. In addition, Justice Alito issued a concurring opinion, in which the Chief Justice and Justice Antonin Scalia joined. You can access the ruling at this link and the oral argument transcript at this link.
And Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court in Waddington v. Sarausad, No. 07-772. Justice David H. Souter issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined. You can access the ruling at this link and the oral argument transcript at this link.
Finally, today the Court also issued an Order List, which you can access at this link. Following more than eight pages of GVRs, the Court called for the views of the Solicitor General in one case.
Full post as published by How Appealing on January 21, 2009 (boomark / email).
Copyright Lawsuits: Critical Issues Before Filing Copyright
Federa Rule 11(b) Considerations
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

Court won’t save porn law, alters immunity rule
Exclusionary rule and qualified immunity
Where would you be without porn
Van Horn v. Watson (Cal. Supreme Ct. - Dec. 18, 2008)
One Free Bite vs. Duty to Rescue: Texas Supreme Court Expands Liability in Dog Attacks
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 365 Doesnt Save Notice Of Appeal Improperly Filed In Appellate Court







