Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Legal Theory Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Legal Theory BlogPacces on Investor Protection & Corporate Law and Economics
By Lawrence Solum
Alessio M. Pacces (Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam - Rotterdam Institute of Law and Economics) has posted Why Investor Protection is Not All that Matters in Corporate Law and Economics on SSRN. Here is the abstract:
The standard approach to the legal foundations of corporate governance is based on the 'law matters' thesis, according to which corporate law promotes separation of ownership and control by protecting minority shareholders from expropriation. This paper takes a broader perspective on the economic and legal determinants of corporate governance. It shows that investor protection is a necessary, but not sufficient, legal condition for efficient separation of ownership and control. Supporting control powers vested in managers or controlling shareholders is at least as important as protecting investors from their abuse. Corporate law does not only matter in the last respect; it matters in both. This result is derived by interpreting corporate governance based on three categories of private benefits of control. Corporate law affects corporate governance depending on its impact on each category of private benefits, and not just on those accounting for shareholder expropriation. Three major areas of corporate law are considered with this view. The first is the legal distribution of corporate powers. The second is the discipline of related-party transactions. The third is regulation of control transactions. The three areas are investigated comparatively in the US, the UK, Italy, Sweden, and the Netherlands. The investigation shows that, when corporate law is analyzed in this fashion, it explains the different patterns and performance of corporate governance. This account of corporate law is not only useful for understanding separation of ownership and control, but also for indicating how to improve its efficiency through legal intervention.
Full post as published by Legal Theory Blog on January 19, 2009 (boomark / email).
E2 Treaty Investor Visa Questions
E2 Visa Assistance
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
DLP
Ohio State to Receive $42 Million in Corporate Taxes Settlement
Investor Fraud
Company president and director Gregory William Rivers to pay $10,000 shareholder fraud settlement.
imbee Data Collection
Industrious Kid, Inc. pays $130,000 civil penalty for violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.
Germantown Primary Care Associates, P.C.
Unlawfully collected fees refunded in Consumer Protection Act violation suit.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Hutchinson Oil
Over $75,000 settlement reached in consumer protection lawsuit.

Investor Protection and Interest Group Politics
The Difficulties of Law and Finance: An Update from Roberta Romano
Corporate Governance and Collusive Behaviour
Labor and Corporate Governance: International Evidence from Restructuring Decisions
China Is One Lousy Investor. And This Is What We Are Waiting For








