Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Corporate Governance
: The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance BlogInvestor Protection and Interest Group Politics
By Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance
The Program on Corporate Governance has recently issued as a discussion paper my piece, co-authored with Zvika Neeman, entitled Investor Protection and Interest Group Politics. We develop in this paper a framework for analyzing how interest group politics influence investor protection levels. Our analysis identifies factors that impede desirable corporate governance reforms, and can help explain the ways in which investor protection levels vary around the world and over time. The abstract of the paper is as follows:
We model how lobbying by interest groups affects the level of investor protection. In our model, insiders in existing public companies, institutional investors (financial intermediaries), and entrepreneurs who plan to take companies public in the future, compete for influence over the politicians setting the level of investor protection. We identify conditions under which this lobbying game has an inefficiently low equilibrium level of investor protection. Factors that operate to reduce investor protection below its efficient level include the ability of corporate insiders to use the corporate assets they control to influence politicians, as well as the inability of institutional investors to capture the full value that efficient investor protection would produce for outside investors. The interest that entrepreneurs (and existing public firms) have in raising equity capital in the future reduces but does not eliminate the distortions arising from insiders’ interest in extracting rents from the capital public firms already have. Our analysis generates testable predictions, and can explain existing empirical evidence, regarding the way in which investor protection varies over time and around the world.
The full paper is available for download here.
Full post as published by The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog on December 18, 2007 (boomark / email).
E2 Treaty Investor Visa Questions
E2 Visa Assistance
Privacy Protection Act 42 USC 21A
Federal Newsroom Law
Truth In Lending Act
Consumer Loans and Consumer Credit Protection Act
Office Politics
Ramsey County pays two deputies $750,000 settlement after being placed in dead end jobs.
Investor Fraud
Company president and director Gregory William Rivers to pay $10,000 shareholder fraud settlement.
Stock Market Losses
alleging bad financial advice and conflicts of interest.
JP Morgan Chase & Co
Faces Lawsuit Over Hikes in Credit Card Interest Rate
Meta Financial Group, Inc CASH Securities Fraud
Meta Financial Group, Inc CASH
Tax Discrepancies
Northwest Airlines pays IRS $12.6 million settlement for taxes and interest.

Why Immigrants Choose The Investor Status Option
Proposed Restatement Guidelines Draw Investor Alarm
How Investor Status Affects The Immigrant And His Family
FINRA's Messages on Weathering Tough Times
Why People Might Apply For Investor Status








