Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Res ipsa loquitur
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: Res ipsa loquiturThou Shalt Not Make Demands of the Court: Litigants Ask for Delay of Oral Argument Pending Moment of Truth From the Court Over the Ten Commandments
By jonathanturley
Full post as published by Res ipsa loquitur on November 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.

Unusual Delay of Oral Arguments In Summum Case Requested, But Apparently Ignored
Thou Shalt Use the Equal Protection Clause for Religion Cases (Not Just the Establishment Clause)
ACLU Seeks Attorneys Fees In 10 Commandments Case
Taylor v. Sturgell Oral Argument
Fives Solict Comments On Proposed Change to Rule Concerning Recordings of Oral Arguments









