Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Legal Commentary Blogs -> Res ipsa loquitur
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Legal Commentary
: Res ipsa loquiturHairstyle Strike is Struck: South Carolina Rules that Dreadlocks Are Not a Race-Neutral Basis for Striking a Juror
By jonathanturley
Full post as published by Res ipsa loquitur on October 29, 2008 (boomark / email).
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
South Carolina Firm
Recalls Frozen Meat and Poultry Products
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
Discrimination
race, gender, disability, religious or age discrimiation.
Wal-Mart
To Pay $17.5 Million To Settle Race Bias Suit
Kodak
Settles Race Discrimination Class Action for $21 Million
Compass Group
Faces Federal Race Discrimination Class Action

SC Supreme Court says that dreadlocks is insufficient reason to strike juror
Dreadlocks & the Law: Are They Race-Neutral
Exclusion of Juror Wearing Dreadlocks Held Impermissible Under Batson
People v. Gonzales (Cal. Ct. App. - July 30, 2008)
Dreadlocks & the Law: Are They Race-Neutral
South Carolina DOT Maintenance Foreman Perishes








