Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Litigation Blogs -> How Appealing
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Litigation
: How Appealing"Dreadlocks shouldn't keep man from jury; S.C. Supreme Court rules potential juror shouldn't have been dismissed for hair"
You can access yesterday's ruling of the Supreme Court of South Carolina at this link (via "Religion Clause").
Full post as published by How Appealing on October 28, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Discouraging Union Organizers
Strict work place rules
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
VA Sets New Benefit Rules for Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses
Agent Orange-Related Ilnesses VA Sets New Benefit Rules
US Army Corps of Engineers
Class action dismissed for allegedly failing to protect New Orleans from the levee breach.
False Arrest
City of Greer pays $50,000 settlement after imprisoning a woman whose charges had been dismissed years earlier.
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case
Jury Awards $29M in Elder Abuse Case

SC Supreme Court says that dreadlocks is insufficient reason to strike juror
Exclusion of Juror Wearing Dreadlocks Held Impermissible Under Batson
Dreadlocks & the Law: Are They Race-Neutral
Nevada Supreme Court considers issue of grand juror bias
Hair Today, Gone Tomorrow: Georgia Supremes Rule on Dreads








