Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> North Carolina Injury Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: North Carolina Injury Lawyer BlogMedtronic Injury Case Before the Supreme Court Will Impact Fate of Defective Medical Device Lawsuits
Medical device manufacturer Medtronic wants the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that medical device makers are exempt from products liability lawsuits, if a device that caused the injury is FDA approved.
The specific case, Riegel v. Medtronic, stems from a personal injury lawsuit filed by the family of Charles Riegel, a man whose Medtronic-manufactured balloon catheter burst while he was undergoing a medical procedure to clear his arteries.
In the lawsuit against Medtronics, Riegel cited negligent design and labeling and manufacturing issues. The catheter was FDA approved. The lawsuit was thrown out at both the U.S. District Court level and the US Court of Appeals level before arriving at the Supreme Court.
Medtronics claims that amendments to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act say that FDA-approved medical devices are preempted from product liability lawsuits in state civil courts. The amendments, however, do not say that federal standards are preempted by state common law claims. This, however, is what Medtronics is claiming and the Bush Administration supports with the device maker?s assertion.
If the Supreme Court decides that Medtronics is right, anyone injured by a defective medical device won?t be able to file a personal injury claim or lawsuit.
Last December, Medtronics agreed to pay $114 million to settle 2,682 products liability lawsuits by people who had used the company?s Marquis implanted cardiac defibrillators. A battery problem had caused some of the defibrillators, implanted in patients at risk of heart attacks, to fail. ICD?s had to be surgically replaced in 11,000 patients.
Last year, Medtronic announced an international recall of heart-defibrillator wires, which were fracturing at a rapid rate. Some 235,000 people have these wires implanted in their chests.
If you have been injured or suffered health problems or have had to undergo a medical procedure because of a defective medical device, you should contact our North Carolina or South Carolina products liability law firm immediately.
Medtronic Supreme Court Case Could Have Dire Consequences for Consumers Injured by Defective Medical Devices, NewsInferno, January 3, 2008
Medtronic to Pay $114 Million In Settling Heart-Device Suits, The Wall Street Journal, December 21, 2007
Related Web Resources:
Riegel v. Medtronic, Supreme Court Docket
Full post as published by North Carolina Injury Lawyer Blog on January 17, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
National Practitioner Data Bank Fact
NPDB identifies unprofessional healthcare practitioners
Employee Lawsuits (An Introduction and Topic Overview)
How employers can cope with the siege of employee lawsuits
Medtronic CD Horizon
allegedly recalled as defective device for being prone to failure, shearing and cable breaks.
Birth Injury - Birth Injury Malpractice, Birth Injury Lawyer, Birth Injury Claims
Birth Injury alleging injuries resulting at birth from medical malpractice or negligence.
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Patent Infringement
Cardia agrees to pay $2.25 million settlement in medical device lawsuit.
Mirrors
Recalled Due to Impact and Laceration Hazards
Shoulder Pain Pump
alleging defective pain pump can cause injury during surgery.

U.S. Supreme Court Rules on Medical Device Lawsuits
House Investigates Defective Medical Device Protections
Supreme Court Considers Whether To Provide Drug Manufacturers Injury Lawsuit Protection
Supreme Court Decides in Favor of Medtronic









