ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Labor & Employment Law Blogs -> New York Public Personnel Law

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Labor & Employment Law

: New York Public Personnel Law

NLRB Holds Michigan Charter School Is Private Employer Subject To Jurisdiction of NLRB

ADVERTISEMENTS
NLRB Holds Michigan Charter School Is Private Employer Subject To Jurisdiction of NLRB
Source: Adjunct Law Prof Blog; Reproduced with permission. Copyright © 2008, Mitchell H. Rubinstein, Esq., Adjunct Professor of Law, St. Johns Law School and New York Law School, All rights reserved

Charter School Administrative Services, 353 NLRB No. 35 (Sept. 30, 2008), is an important decision. The issue in the case was whether a Michigan Charter school was an employer subject to the jurisdiction of the NLRB and the Board held that it was. Charter School Administrative Services, 353 NLRB No. 35 (Sept. 30, 2008), is an important decision. The issue in the case was whether a Michigan Charter school was an employer subject to the jurisdiction of the NLRB and the Board held that it was.

The Board reached this result even though Michigan considered the school to be a governmental entity and was subject to state laws such as the Freedom of Information Act. In finding that the school was subject to the Act, the Board applied the following test and reasoned as follows:

In determining whether an entity is a political subdivision, the Board applies the test described in NLRB v. Natural Gas Utility District of Hawkins County, 402 U.S. 600, 604?605 (1971) (Hawkins County). Under that test, an entity is exempt from the Board?s jurisdiction as a political subdivision if it is either

(1) created directly by the State so as to constitute a department or administrative arm of the government, or

(2) administered by individuals who are responsible to public officials or to the general electorate. . . .

The ?courts and the Board generally consider whether a majority of the employer?s governing body?the governing board and executive officers?is appointed by or subject to removal by public officials.? Aramark Corp. v. NLRB, 156 F.3d 1087, 1093 (10th Cir. 1998), vacated in part on rehearing en banc 176 F.3d 872 (10th Cir.)

Specifically, the Board looks to whether the composition, selection and removal of the employer?s board of directors are determined by law or by the employer?s own governing documents. Research Foundation, 337 NLRB at 969.The Board routinely has asserted jurisdiction over private employers who have agreements with government entities to provide certain types of services. For example, in Research Foundation, supra, the employer was a private, non-profit corporation that had a contract with the City University of New York (CUNY), a public university.

Mitchell H. Rubinstein

Full post as published by New York Public Personnel Law on October 10, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0153 secs (new cache)