ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Corporate Governance Blogs -> The Race to the Bottom

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Corporate Governance

: The Race to the Bottom

In re Lear: Its Tough to Be a Proxy Advisory Service In VC Strine's Court (Part 4)

By J. Robert Brown

ADVERTISEMENTS

VC Strine doesn't like proxy advisory services, with ISS at the forefront.  ISS of course provides recommendations on matters voted upon by shareholders.  That he views the influence of ISS in negative terms has been clear from his extra curricular activities.  In a talk that became an article, he noted: 

  • With power dynamics changing toward activist institutional investors, independent directors who wish to remain in the game will seek to avoid the ire of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), the business op-ed commentators at the New York Times, and so forth.
He continues in that vein in the Lear decision.  Apparently ISS doesn't make the decision based upon the best interests of shareholders but out of a need to garner additional business.  As VC Strine described:  "And the incentives of a firm like ISS also give it reason to play coy.  In order to demonstrate its value and clout to its customers, ISS has an incentive to act as a quasi-negotiator, using the proxy solcitiaton process as a way to encourage a higher bid, and using its recommendation tool to extract value." 

ISS is an organization that largely assists shareholders in making decisions when they vote.  In fact, while there is no doubt that proxy advisors are influential, large shareholders make their own decisions.  Studies have noted this.  A recent article on the election of directors at JC Penney indicated that most of the proxy advisory services (including ISS) had recommended a vote against the Penney board.  Nonetheless, it seems that the institutional investors made up their own mind.  As the article reported:

  • But many of the fund managers that make up a big chunk of J.C. Penney shareholders -- 94% of the company is owned by institutional investors -- had other ideas.
  • A review of regulatory filings made during the past two weeks shows that some of Penney's largest shareholders, including Legg Mason Value Trust, Bill Miller's mutual fund (which has around a $200 million stake in Penney), and Vanguard 500 Index Fund ($83 million), voted for the directors.
But VC Strine doesn't want anyone aiding shareholders.  In the pro-management environment of Delaware, this is an anathema. 

Full post as published by The Race to the Bottom on October 08, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.0024 secs (from cache 11/06/26 05:17:32)