Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Insurance Defense Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Insurance Defense BlogThe 30 day period for judicial review of a MD WCC award is not extended by three days for mailing
By Dave Stratton
In Chance v. WMATA, No. 240 (In the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, April 4, 2007), the Court held that the 30 day period to file a petition for judicial review under LE Section 9-737 starts running from the date of the mailing of the Commission's order, and that the 30 day period is NOT extended by Md. Rule 1-203(c)(which provides for a three-day extension to a presribed period within which a party has a right to act when the period commences after service upon the party). Further, the opinion states that the 30 day period is in the nature of a statute of limitations and thus subject to waiver by failure of a party to raise it in the proper manner. Id., at n. 6. In short, in a Md WCC matter, the losing party gets 30 days to file the petition for judicial review, and no extra 3 days for mailing. And if the other side makes that mistake and you don't raise it properly, the defense is waived.
Full post as published by Insurance Defense Blog on April 06, 2007 (boomark / email).
CVS Mailing
Sparks Allegations of Privacy Violation
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Medical Malpractice Suits Brings $37M Award
Jevic Transportation
allegedly failing to give 60 days warning before closing plant.
Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Brings $4.5 Million Award
Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Brings $4.5 Million Award
MySpace Spam
Spammers to pay $230 million settlement in e-mailing lawsuit.
Medical Malpractice
US Government awards family $750,000 settlement after woman dies after undergoing eight surgeries in 35 days.

Alabama Supreme Court clarifies procedure for appealing decisions of an arbitrator
Agreement May Not Expand Judicial Review of Arbitration Award
Harel & Kahan on Judicial Review








