Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Appellate Law Blogs -> Illinois Appellate Lawyer Blog
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Appellate Law
: Illinois Appellate Lawyer BlogCertified Question Improper Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 308, But Appellate Court Takes Interlocutory Appeal Anyway
By Steven R. Merican
Jerry Walker suffered a personal injury when she fell while cruising on a Carnival Cruise Line ship. She sued Carnival in Illinois, but her ticket stated that disputes must be litigated in Miami, Florida. Carnival sought dismissal of Jerry?s lawsuit, arguing that Illinois was not the proper forum. The Illinois trial court ruled that the forum-selection provision on Jerry?s ticket was unenforceable, and denied Carnival?s motion.
Because an order denying a motion to dismiss is not final and appealable, Carnival asked for permission to appeal. The trial court allowed the interlocutory appeal, and, pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 308, certified the following question for the appellate court to answer: ?Whether the trial court erred in its application of law pertaining to its denial of Carnival's ? motion to dismiss ??
Rule 308 interlocutory appeals are allowed when the trial court certifies ?a question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and where an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.? The First District Illinois Appellate Court ruled that the question certified by the trial court was not a proper Rule 308 question.
Here, the first certified question, as framed by the circuit court, although properly couched in Rule 308 language, essentially asks this court to review the underlying order, finding the forum-selection clause unenforceable. This request is merely seeking a review of the trial court's application of the law to a given set of facts rather than a properly written certified question which articulates a specific question of law.
Citing the ?interest of judicial economy and reaching an equitable result,? the appellate court decided to take the appeal despite the improper certified question. In the end, the court ruled that Carnival?s forum-selection provision was enforceable. Read the whole case, Walker v. Carnival Cruise Lines, No. 1-07-3538 (5/21/08) by clicking here. (Free subscription through Lexis One required.)
Full post as published by Illinois Appellate Lawyer Blog on August 27, 2008 (boomark / email).
Selection of State Supreme Court Judges
How State Court Judges are Selected
California Supreme Court Proposition 8 Decision
Court Rejects Challenges to Proposition 8, but Finds Marriages Valid
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz (Supreme Court): Does Obama meet the constitutional requirements to be President
Unwed Fathers' Rights in Adoption
Landmark Cases in Adoption Law Shape Law with respect to Unwed Fathers
Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Career Choices
Descriptions of law enforcement occupations
Heart of Atlanta v United States
Supreme Court Decision: Civil Rights Act Protected by Interstate Commerce Clause
Ebay Fined
French Court Sets Fine at $61 Million
Personal Injury
Appeals Court Upholds Congressional Legislation
Tomato Salmonella
Sheetz Convenience Stores agrees to confidential out-of-court settlement with food poisoning victim.
National Association of Realtors
Settlement reached in broker listing antitrust lawsuit, pending court approval.
Missouri Attorney General's Office
$26,000 settlement reached in disability discrimination lawsuit, pending court approval.
Rutland School District
Double pay offered as part of class action wage dispute settlement, pending court approval.

Supreme Court Accepts Interlocutory Appeal in Ryan Case
Rule 54(b) certification improper, so appeal is dismissed
What Is the Deadline for "Ungranting" a New Trial
Ryan II: Delaware Chancery Court Denies Interlocutory Appeal
Brief-Writing Tips for the Illinois Appellate Court







