ADVERTISEMENT



Google       

Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Law Humor Blogs -> Lowering the Bar

OR PHONE (866) 635-1838 for Bankruptcy Help, (866) 635-6190 for Divorce,
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense

Find a Local Lawyer

Bankruptcy (866) 635-1838
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402

Bookmark

Law Humor

: Lowering the Bar

Naked Cowboy v. Mars Lawsuit Allowed to Go Forward

By Kevin Underhill

ADVERTISEMENTS

On June 23, a federal judge in New York denied a motion to dismiss Robert Burck's trademark-infringement claims against Mars, Inc., and its ad agency.  Mars is the maker of M&Ms and other truly outstanding products (it is also one of my firm's clients, although not in this case).  Mr. Burck is better known as "The Naked Cowboy," a Times Square performer who plays guitar while wearing only a white hat, boots, and briefs.  Burck sued in February based on an ad campaign in which M&Ms were shown wearing a somewhat similar outfit:

Nakedcowboymm_6

Burck is the one on the right.

Nakedcowboy_2 According to the lawsuit, Burck has trademarked his look and has licensed his name (the Cowboy name) to various companies.  (Ryan Giles' trademark blog provides some relevant and comical links, including one to the Patent and Trademark Office's web page for Burck's official design mark, shown here.)  But Burck says he has never endorsed M&Ms, which I assume he meant in the narrow legal sense because how could you not "endorse" a high-quality product like M&Ms?  (Did I mention that Mars is a client?)  Judge Denny Chin ruled that Burck had at least properly alleged a claim that "consumers seeing defendants' advertisements would conclude -- incorrectly -- that he had endorsed M&M candy."

Chin did dismiss a right-to-privacy claim also brought by Burck.  While it may seem a little odd that somebody who performs in his briefs in the middle of Times Square would be asserting a "right to privacy," that term is also used to refer to a person's right to protect his or her name or picture from unauthorized use.  Chin held that while this concept would have protected plaintiff in his "Robert Burck" mode, it does not protect the name or picture of a character or role that someone creates, so "Naked Cowboy" Burck does not have a claim of that kind.  But his trademark claim is going forward.

Burck's image appeared in a series of advertisements in which M&Ms appeared on billboards dressed as other iconic New York characters, such as the Statue of Liberty (if it's accurate to call her a "character") and King Kong.  You'd think he would be willing to cut advertisers a little slack -- if we're going to start pointing fingers, what about the fact that the Cowboy, who wears briefs, is technically not "Naked"?  He may appear to be, depending on guitar placement, but that only heightens the deception.

A pretrial conference is set for July 11.

Link: Reuters

Full post as published by Lowering the Bar on July 07, 2008 (boomark / email).

Bloggers, promote your law blog by nominating your blog for inclusion in USLaw.com's Law Blog Directory and RSS Reader. Benefits described.
Related Law Articles

Lawsuits and Settlements

Related Searches

























































































































US Law
#1 Online Legal Resource













Your Blog Subscriptions
Subscribe to blogs

10,000+ Law Job Listings
Lawyer . Police . Paralegal . Etc
Earn a law-related degree
Are you the author of this blog? Adding USLaw.com to your Blogroll increases relevance. You qualify to display a USLaw Network badge.
Suggest changes to this blog's description or nominate another for inclusion. Register for updates.


Practice Area
Zip Code:

Contact a Lawyer Now!






0.017 secs (new cache)