Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Intellectual Property Law Blogs -> Business and Technology Law

Intellectual Property Law

: Business and Technology Law

Trademark Law and the Naked Cowboy

By Stephanie Robinson

The Naked Cowboy (a/k/a Robert Burck), a New York icon, is usually in the news for his well-known antics as a street performer. But the Naked Cowboy recently made some trademark law in a battle with Mars, Inc. and its Blue M & M. In Burck v. Mars, Inc., 2008 WL 2485524 (S.D.N.Y. 2008), the court recognized Burck?s trademark rights in the name and likeness of ?The Naked Cowboy? but also allowed Mars to raise a defense of parody even though the parody was being used in part for advertising purposes. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York described Burck as follows: ?a ?street entertainer? who performs in New York City?s Times Square as The Naked Cowboy, wearing only a white cowboy hat, cowboy boots, and underpants, and carrying a guitar strategically placed to give the illusion of nudity.? Burck owns registered U.S. trademarks in the Naked Cowboy name and likeness. Starting in April 2007, Mars began running an animated cartoon advertisement on two oversized video billboards in Times Square featuring a blue M & M dressed ?exactly like The Naked Cowboy, wearing only a white cowboy hat, cowboy boots, and underpants, and carrying a guitar.? The court illustrated these facts with the following picture: Burck sued Mars for compensatory and punitive damages asserting violations of New York?s right to publicity laws and trademark infringement. The court dismissed Burck?s right to privacy claim but held that Burck could proceed with his false endorsement claim under the Lanham Act because consumers might mistakenly conclude that the Blue M & M advertisements were endorsements of Mars? products by Burck. The court, however, denied Burck?s motion to strike Mars? affirmative defense of parody. According to the court, parody is a form of fair use that is protected under the First Amendment. This protection applies even where the parody is used in part for advertising purposes. Specifically, the court held that ?because a parody may be of a hybrid nature, combining artistic expression and commercial promotion, it is valid to plead a parody defense even where the parody is used in part for advertising purposes.? The dispute between the Naked Cowboy and the Blue M & M will therefore continue.

Full post as published by Business and Technology Law on August 06, 2008 (boomark / email).