Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Copyright Law Blogs -> Citizen Media Law Project
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Copyright Law
: Citizen Media Law ProjectSingaporean Company Claims Patent to Image-Based Linking: Patent Busting Needed!
By Sam Bayard
Vuestar, a patent-holding company from Singapore that describes itself as "the Pioneer of visual search," is asserting patent rights in the technology that enables websites to link to other webpages using an image rather than text. According to Ars Technica, the firm recently has been sending invoices to companies that it believes are using its patented technology. The impact of this patent claim could be huge -- as another report puts it, "almost every site on the Internet" uses this technology to link photos and graphics to other webpages. This Vuestar logo is a good example (and, no, it doesn't link to Stuff on My Cat.com):
Vuestar claims to hold patents in Singapore, Australia, and the United States. The U.S. patent, titled "Method of locating web-pages by utilising visual images," was filed in 2001 and granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in 2006. While the patent claim itself appears to describe an image-based search engine technology (which sounds very similar to Google Image Search), Vuestar apparently believes that the claim extends further. The FAQ section of Vuestar's website makes clear that the company views ordinary website image-linking practices as within the scope of its patent.
I'm no patent expert, but at least under U.S. law, this patent looks like it has serious problems in terms of "obviousness" in light of prior art in the field. Jacqui Cheng at Ars provides some helpful analysis of this point. This is an excellent candidate for some patent busting efforts or maybe just a good old-fashioned lawsuit. There are lots of interesting questions, including whether the patent claim can encompass Vuestar's assertion relating to ordinary page-to-page links (i.e., non-search-engine-y uses), and whether the patent was non-obvious in light of prior text-based search and linking technology. Go get 'em!
P.S. TechCrunch's post wins the award for most humorous, noting that the Vuestar patent "is kind of like creating a patent to identify a goat on sight."
Full post as published by Citizen Media Law Project on May 29, 2008 (boomark / email).
California Limited Liability Company Formation
Relevant information for starting a limited liability company in California
Stock Splits and Reverse Stock Splits
How splits can affect stock value
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
Zantac Patent
GlaxoSmithKline and Cypress Pharmaceutical settle patent infringement dispute.
Search Engine Optimization Claims
Web based company pays over $150,000 settlement in Internet lawsuit.
Soliris Patent
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. agrees to pay the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation a $10 million patent infringement settlement.
DRAM Patent
ProMOS Technologies and Mosel Vitelic pay MOSAID Technologies an undisclosed patent infringement settlement.
Sony
to Pay $18.5 Million For Patent Infringment

Singapore Firm Claims Link Patent
Maker of Blackberry Devices Facing New Patent Infringement Challenge
U.S. Patent Office Rejects All Ninety-Five NeoMedia Patent Claims
In re Swanson: CAFC Allows Reexamination Based on Reference Previously Considered by PTO and Courts
Support Senate Patent Reform and the EFF Patent Busting Project!
Welcome to Texas: Keep Your Powder Dry








