Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Academic Blogs -> Feminist Law Professors
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Academic
: Feminist Law Professors?Free Speech & the Menace of Hysteria?
By Ann Bartow
I recently returned from a conference where one of the panels I spoke on concerned “hate speech” and the other addressed related topics. The audience skewed heavily libertarian, but the conversations sparked by the panels still seemed fairly productive. However, one reaction I received was the objection that I was “scaring womnen away from the Internet” with my documented accounts of cyberattacks and online (and offline) stalkers. In figuring how to formulate a response to that, I was happy to see that the brilliant law prof Jeremy Waldron has a book review forthcoming in the NY Review of Books that addresses hate speech concerns, as follows:
Lewis’s settled position, I think, is that we do better to swallow hard and tolerate “the thought that we hate” than open ourselves to the dangers of state regulation. I am not convinced. The case is certainly not clear on either side, and Lewis acknowledges that. But it is worth remembering a couple of final points.
First, the issue is not thought that we hate, as though defenders of hate speech laws want to get inside people’s minds. The issue is publication and the harm done to individuals and groups through the disfiguring of our social environment by visible, public, and semi-permanent announcements to the effect that in the opinion of one group in the community, perhaps the majority, members of another group are not worthy of equal citizenship….
Secondly, the issue is not just our learning to tolerate thought that we hate….The harm that expressions of racial hatred do is harm in the first instance to the groups who are denounced or bestialized in pamphlets, billboards, talk radio, and blogs. It is not harm–if I can put it bluntly–to the white liberals who find the racist invective distasteful….The question is about the direct targets of the abuse. Can their lives be led, can their children be brought up, can their hopes be maintained and their worst fears dispelled, in a social environment polluted by these materials? Those are the concerns that need to be answered when we defend the use of the First Amendment to strike down laws prohibiting the publication of racial hatred.
I look forward to reading the entire essay when it is available to me. Via Brian Leiter, who has additional commentary.
–Ann Bartow
Full post as published by Feminist Law Professors on May 27, 2008 (boomark / email).
Parody is a Protected Form of Speech
Targets of criticism seek to shut down Internet sites that poke fun
Free Speech
Canterbury agrees to pay $60,000 settlement in civil rights lawsuit.
Indianapolis
alleging the city's police are overly aggressive against the homeless in violation of the protection of free speech and unreasonable searches guaranteed in the US Constitution.
ValueClick
allegedly violated consumer protection laws by promising ‘free’ goods that where not actually free.
Oppenheimer ATM-Free New York Municipals
401(k) / ERISA Stock Fraud
TransUnion
Class action credit practices suit offers free credit monitoring services for millions.
Free Water Sewer Services
US Cold Storage to pay $125,910 in sewer service settlement.

More on censorship, and freedom, in Canada
Halpern "Hysteria" Big Embarassment to SSP and NSSTA
The "Bush Doctrine" and the Palin Hysteria
Supreme Court of Canada Defends Fair Comment and Free Speech
Kilmartin on Free Exercise & Free Speech








