Home -> Law Blog Directory -> Personal Injury Law Blogs -> Richmond Virginia Personal Injury Lawyer
(866) 635-2689 for Personal Injury or (866) 635-9402 for Criminal Defense
Find a Local Lawyer
Divorce (866) 635-6190
Personal Injury (866) 635-2689
Criminal Defense (866) 635-9402
Personal Injury Law
: Richmond Virginia Personal Injury LawyerRace Discrimination Case Wins Class Status at the Fourth Circuit
By Zev Antell
The generally conservative Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued a ruling effectively granting class action status to a racial discrimination lawsuit originating out of South Carolina. The case involves alleged racial discrimination at a Nucor Steel plant. The Plaintiffs in the case claim, among other things, that African Americans were improperly denied promotions. They further allege that far more blatant incidents of racism took place at the plant as well. For example, the Plaintiffs contend that paraphernalia exhibiting the Confederate flag was available at the plant gift shop and that certain Caucasian employees openly used racial epithets while on the job.
Class status means that not only the named plaintiffs can be a party to a suit and that the interests of many, many affected people can be represented all at once. In this case, class status had been denied at the lower court level and was appealed to the Fourth Circuit. There, it was ultimately determined that the District Court Judge abused his discretion in refusing to certify the class.
The decision in Brown v. Nucor was just published on August 7, 2009 and can be found at Brown v. Nucor Corp., 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17643. For a number of reasons, the opinion may be significant. For starters, the case gives a clear roadmap on when and how a race class can win certification in the Fourth Circuit. Secondly, the opinion may signal a shift in how the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals will treat similar cases going forward.
It is important to recognize that while this opinion marks a clear and decisive victory for the Plaintiffs, it says little about the merits of the case itself. The Court did not pass judgment on any facts or liability; it merely allowed the case to proceed as a class action. In laymen's terms, the Plaintiffs won a big battle, but they have not yet won the war. It remains to be seen what happens next. Nevertheless, the precedential value of the Court's opinion is undeniable as it will almost certainly play a prominent role in future discrimination actions where class status is sought.
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Zev Antell
Full post as published by Richmond Virginia Personal Injury Lawyer on August 13, 2009 (boomark / email).
Discrimination
Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disability
Paxil Lawsuit
Paxil Claims, Lawsuits, and Injuries
The Civil Rights Act of 1871
Law bans discrimination enacted under color of state law
Immigration Related Employment Discrimination & Unfair Labor Practices
What to do about employers who discriminate because of national origin
Kodak
Settles Race Discrimination Class Action for $21 Million
Compass Group
Faces Federal Race Discrimination Class Action
Speedway Fatality
'Amazing Race' family wins lawsuit with Daytona Speedway.
Discrimination
race, gender, disability, religious or age discrimiation.
Specialty Lamp International
Recalls Counterfeit Circuit Breakers
FedEx
Ground Business Model Wins Class Action in Washington

Religious Accommodation Cannot Require Excessive Absenteeism From Work
"Wal-Mart wins chance to block class-action suit"
CA1: race discrimination case affirmed
D.C. Circuit Splits in Sex, Race Discrimination Case
Moral Stereotyping as Family Status Discrimination
"3rd Circuit Rejects Certification in UPS Discrimination Case"







